Closed jkrems closed 10 years ago
published in 1.2.2
Does this need unpublishing?
It probably needs its own testium test suite.
Not sure what you mean - this is what was unpublished. The funny thing is: it was tested against testium2 at least and worked fine.
But, on a related note: I'd appreciate a re-publish (e.g. with a major bump) so I can switch testium2 back to a proper version of selenium-download
. :)
I tested it before publishing and it worked fine. Ugh.
I'd rather not publish a known bad version, even if we do plan to update it. I can, but it just feels wrong.
Ah, got what makes this a "bad version": https://code.google.com/p/selenium/issues/detail?id=8102
I never tested it in combination with phantomjs since testium2 launches phantomjs directly.
I hope this is fixed soon and we can simply bump to the next version. =/
LGTM.