Minor typos

[NathanBaulch]

PR #7487 fixes a bunch of typos across the entire project, however it's been deemed too far reaching for a single commit from an unknown author without prior discussion. Understandable.

How should these changes be broken up? cc @purnesh42H

I admit that I didn't take the time to figure out how to install the correct protoc + plugin versions to regenerate all code (https://buf.build takes care of that in my projects) so I wouldn't be surprised if that caused some problems.

FWIW a couple of these typos have already been fixed upstream via https://github.com/grpc/grpc-proto/pull/158.

For anyone curious (cc @arvindbr8), I used a combination of the excellent typos tool along with the "Typos" IntelliJ IDE inspection. Both methods produce a non-trivial number of false positives that have to be manually checked however.

[purnesh42H]

@NathanBaulch i the PR you have a list of words that are spelled wrong. Can you mention that list in the issue? Also, better to send one pr word as per your list. Thanks

[NathanBaulch]

Sure, here's the full list with number of occurrences:

• cancelation (6)
• ceritificate (6)
• andcleanup (5)
• configurated (4)
• existant (3)
• indaequate (3)
• unimplemneted (3)
• aggretator (2)
• certifcate (2)
• fo (2)
• keealive (2)
• readd (2)
• remainining (2)
• shoud (2)
• shuting (2)
• sugned (2)
• unexpect (2)
• verfies (2)
• adressses (1)
• affectes (1)
• aother (1)
• asynchorous (1)
• beld (1)
• brackers (1)
• bufer (1)
• calle (1)
• catapul (1)
• closd (1)
• communitcated (1)
• configurtion (1)
• congiguration (1)
• containning (1)
• contetion (1)
• deaclock (1)
• depenedency (1)
• effet (1)
• entris (1)
• failes (1)
• flakyness (1)
• forwarrd (1)
• gerenated (1)
• grpah graph (1)
• handerler (1)
• hte (1)
• indiacte (1)
• indiciating (1)
• insenitive (1)
• ithe (1)
• leakcheker (1)
• limtit (1)
• metedata (1)
• nesponse (1)
• ninetyninth (1)
• ocnfiguration (1)
• onepassed one (1)
• ot (1)
• polcies (1)
• polcy (1)
• potentional (1)
• prinicipal (1)
• prinicpal (1)
• recusively (1)
• repoting (1)
• resemebling to (1)
• respsectively (1)
• routeguild (1)
• sceanrio (1)
• serch (1)
• sice (1)
• simillar (1)
• specfied (1)
• statusmakes (1)
• successul (1)
• tesing (1)
• testsdata (1)
• throtlled (1)
• tranport (1)
• transpot (1)
• unrary (1)
• unsupport (1)
• utiliztion (1)
• walkaround (1)
• wathers (1)

[NathanBaulch]

better to send one pr word as per your list

I don't follow, can you clarify this request @purnesh42H?

[purnesh42H]

@NathanBaulch scratch that. Initially i was thinking we can have one pr to fix each word typo but that will be too many PRs. Can you send smaller PR that doesn't modify more than 2-3 files? If the code change is in generated interfaces, that's ok as that require each interface to be generated again

[NathanBaulch]

I don't believe I touched any code generated files (assuming you mean *.pb.go), so 89 files in groups of 3 means I need to break it into 30 PRs?

[dfawley]

It seems the tests are failing due to a reflection test (caused by the typo fix?), otherwise, let's just rip off the bandaid and merge the big PR in its current state.

[NathanBaulch]

Fixed @dfawley - I've restored a couple of intentional typos in the reflection tests and everything is passing now.