[...]For type "Polygon", the "coordinates" member MUST be an array of linear ring coordinate arrays. [...]
A linear ring is further specified:
[...]
A linear ring is a closed LineString with four or more positions.
The first and last positions are equivalent, and they MUST contain identical values; their representation SHOULD also be identical.
A linear ring is the boundary of a surface or the boundary of a hole in a surface.
A linear ring MUST follow the right-hand rule with respect to the area it bounds, i.e., exterior rings are counterclockwise, and holes are clockwise.
Note: the [GJ2008] specification did not discuss linear ring winding order. For backwards compatibility, parsers SHOULD NOT reject Polygons that do not follow the right-hand rule.
[...]
This PR makes sure our polygons follow all the rules expect the last one.
In a perfect world we would make sure that all polygons also follow the the right hand rule, but I think because of the note we can get away with just hoping that they do. ^^ Even if they don't it shouldn't be a big problem, because we don't have any polygons with holes.
I noticed that some polygons in our GeoJSONs don't comply to the GeoJSON specification. (See GeoJSON specification section 3.1.6)
The spec sates:
A linear ring is further specified:
This PR makes sure our polygons follow all the rules expect the last one. In a perfect world we would make sure that all polygons also follow the the right hand rule, but I think because of the note we can get away with just hoping that they do. ^^ Even if they don't it shouldn't be a big problem, because we don't have any polygons with holes.