Closed VladimirAlexiev closed 2 years ago
@CraigRe please accept this PR, thanks!
@mgh128 all significant changes are in Ontology/
,
Hi @VladimirAlexiev
I noticed that the CBV ontology is missing a code list for cbv:Comp (the expected value of component
as shown in the UML class diagram). I'm checking with @CraigRe to make sure it's shown correctly in the Word drafts.
I had assumed that on issue #264 we had decided to add cbv:Comp
Yes, we need cbv:Comp, part of #343
@en
from labels because these are JSONLD field names, souom
booleanValue
oruriValue
"@mgh128 Please review EPCIS.ttl, CBV.ttl. @CraigRe don't accept it yet, let's see Mark's review and resolve the last bullet