Open myrmoteras opened 4 years ago
On the paragraph proper, I found the materials citations detect OK, if only after a few corrections to details: specimen codes like 100121
erroneously tag as dates, as this actually might be a condensed form of 1921-01-10
... there are early databases that used this format, so not all too far-fetched it could make it into an article.
After removing those dates, the splitting works spot-on, and most details come up nicely as well. Before that, I tend to think some filter kicked in in the full-document run due to the erroneous splits.