Please review the search unit tests. Specifically take a look at the TODOs in
the file and let me know whether modifying search to support those cases is an
okay extension or will break the semantics you are going for with your search
strategy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r265 | nicole.deflaux@sagebase.org | 2010-10-29 11:09:45 -0700 (Fri, 29 Oct
2010) | 11 lines
Here is the fix to JcrSearchController to enable search over non-text fields.
new review:
owner: hrovira.isb
cc: aeakin@systemsbiology.org, mike.kellen@sagebionetworks.com
summary: Please review search fixs
labels: ReadyForReview
branch: /branches/deflaux/playground
Please review the search fix. Specifically let me know whether modifying
search to support exact matching against non-text fields will break the
semantics you are going for with your search strategy. If so I can revert this
change and add an new search REST api to support this use case.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r293 | nicole.deflaux@sagebase.org | 2010-11-04 16:39:26 -0700 (Thu, 04 Nov
2010) | 13 lines
Extended JCR search controller to filter results to be those recently modified
and to also paginate the results returned. The API is working toward that of
http://code.google.com/apis/gdata/docs/2.0/reference.html#Queries using the RFC
3339 timestamp format. For example: 2005-08-09T10:57:00-08:00.
The use case I'm working toward is to retrieve a feed of recently
created/modified nodes relevant to a particular project. I am envisioning that
all those nodes are tagged for that particular project and the search query is
for that tag value filted by the updated-min date.
new review:
owner: hrovira.isb
cc: aeakin@systemsbiology.org, mike.kellen@sagebionetworks.com
summary: Please review new search filterss
labels: ReadyForReview
branch: /branches/deflaux/playground
Please review the new search filters. This particular code change should not
modify any current behavior, only extend the current behavior.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r294 | nicole.deflaux@sagebase.org | 2010-11-04 22:04:57 -0700 (Thu, 04 Nov
2010) | 3 lines
Added a comment about the efficiency of a recently added loop
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original issue reported on code.google.com by nicole.d...@gtempaccount.com on 10 Nov 2010 at 12:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nicole.d...@gtempaccount.com
on 10 Nov 2010 at 12:45