gsethi / regulome-explorer

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/regulome-explorer
0 stars 0 forks source link

different display mode in "all pairs" when one of the search/filter features is a CLIN or SAMP feature #11

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

When viewing the "all pairs" results, if one of the features being filtered on 
does not have a genomic location (eg is a CLIN or a SAMP feature), it would be 
nice to have a view that looks like the CRC "aggressiveness" view with the 
p-values of the different associations shown (though there wouldn't be the 
notion of "positive" and "negative", only of "significance", but it would make 
it easier to see where the most significant associations are if, say, the 
top-1000 are being shown)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by sreyno...@systemsbiology.org on 1 Feb 2012 at 10:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
actually, as Vesteinn just pointed out to me, there could still be a notion of 
positive and negative along with the significance -- ie |log(p-value)| would 
give the distance from "0" (the significance) and then the sign of the 
correlation coefficient would indicate whether it should be positive/up or 
negative/down relative to 0

Original comment by sreyno...@systemsbiology.org on 1 Feb 2012 at 10:42

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
it would be better to generate a new " significance_score" column on the data 
side.  I can quickly support this, rather than incorporating high level logic 
into the data loader.

Original comment by rkreisberg@systemsbiology.org on 3 Feb 2012 at 12:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
this is the new "isolate" feature, though I'd like to suggest that "feature #2" 
not go away when "isolate" is selected, instead perhaps this mode could be the 
default mode if one of the feature types is a CLIN or SAMP feature (the only 
feature types that as a rule do not have genomic coordinates)?

Original comment by sreyno...@systemsbiology.org on 16 Feb 2012 at 8:35