Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
fixed in svn r92
Original comment by gslen...@gmail.com
on 24 Oct 2008 at 9:21
I'm reviewing this fix and I'm unsure why its needed. Can you explain why this
fix is
needed as it worked before without this fix. I've also had someone now complain
the
current SVN (with this fix) breaks things... so I'm considering pulling this
fix.
cheers,
grant
Original comment by gslen...@gmail.com
on 28 Oct 2008 at 11:03
Hi,
I cross-site gwt compilation mode, the URL of files in public folder can be
server
not in the place of the module but in other place:
Module server by a tomcat server.
GWT js ... by apache server.
The fix work for us but it must not be a problem for you !
We wanted to overwrite getURLSWF and onLoad method but we couldn't because of
private
members , so we had copyed/parsed the entire source code of SVN of class
ChartWidget
to integrate the fix.
That's why I proposed to you this fix ....
Thanks
Eric
Original comment by eric.bru...@laposte.net
on 28 Oct 2008 at 11:53
I'm not sure what to say - I've got issue #9 that is asking for it to be this
way and
you asking for it not to be... and both of you are not being clear about why
you need
it. As such, I've implemented a get/set method and you can change the url to
whatever
you need it to be. Honestly I think you both are doing something wrong if you
need to
mangle the url - you shouldn't need to.
Original comment by gslen...@gmail.com
on 28 Oct 2008 at 12:40
Sorry but I do not wrong here.
In my case (Cross Site compilation : server serve static data (like js and img)
and
rpc call serve by Tomcat application Server), I not have the same URL for rpc
call,
modules and static content. The SWF is a static content serve by a Apache
server (in
my case). The module url is not the same that the static content (in my case).
But the fix, take care about that and is work in production server and in
Hosted Mode
(devel).
I would just help for your product ...
Thanks for spend time.
Cheers
Eric
Original comment by eric.bru...@laposte.net
on 28 Oct 2008 at 4:30
Original comment by gslen...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 5:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
eric.bru...@laposte.net
on 24 Oct 2008 at 5:14