Closed gtalarico closed 4 years ago
There shouldn't be any ambiguous requests since you're including the full namespace.
Voting up your link=
and suggesting this format for the permalinks:
permalink = "revitapidocs.com?link=", symbol, { ".", symbol }, [ "->", doc_resource ];
->
is just a suggestion. [ ]
works just as well.
Examples:
Wall class:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.Wall
Wall class, methods page:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.Wall->Methods
SketchPlane class, properties page:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.SketchPlane->Properties
Intersect method of PlanarFace class:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.PlanarFace.Intersect
CanFlipFacing property of FamilyInstance class:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.FamilyInstance.CanFlipFacing
Plane class, constructors page:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.Plane->Constructor
Plane(XYZ, XYZ) constructor of method of Plane class:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.Plane.Plane(XYZ,XYZ)
Only took one year 😊
[On behalf of @eirannejad]
Examples:
revitapidocs.com?class=Autodesk.Revit.DB.FailureMessageAccessor
orrevitapidocs.com?latest=Autodesk.Revit.DB.FailureMessageAccessor
orrevitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.BuiltinCategory
The primary use case would be for using doc links in forums, code comments etc. This would ensure the link is permanent regardless of Revit version.
Todo:
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.Wall[Class]
revitapidocs.com?link=Autodesk.Revit.DB.Wall[Methods]