gtcasl / gpuocelot

GPUOCelot: A dynamic compilation framework for PTX
http://gpuocelot.gatech.edu/
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
280 stars 69 forks source link

Fix the SVN repository directory layout #53

Closed jwang323 closed 9 years ago

jwang323 commented 9 years ago

From sschuberth on June 24, 2011 09:35:19

What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Browse the SVN repository at https://code.google.com/p/gpuocelot/source/browse/ 2. Look at the directory structure for branches / tags. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I'd expect to see one of the typical SVN repository structures, either

calc/ trunk/ tags/ branches/ calendar/ trunk/ tags/ branches/ spreadsheet/ trunk/ tags/ branches/

or

trunk/ calc/ calendar/ spreadsheet/ … tags/ calc/ calendar/ spreadsheet/ … branches/ calc/ calendar/ spreadsheet/

see http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.reposadmin.planning.html IMHO, the following should be done:

1) Delete the empty svn/branch 2) Move svn/trunk/branches to svn/branches 3) Move svn/trunk/tags/* to /svn/tags/* 4) Delete svn/trunk/tags

Fixing this would also simplify mirroring gpuocelot e.g. in Git. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? N/A

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/gpuocelot/issues/detail?id=54

jwang323 commented 9 years ago

From SolusStu...@gmail.com on July 07, 2011 10:46:06

Thanks for the suggestion.

This one has been with us since revision 1 when we imported ocelot from another repository. We haven't changed it until now mainly because no one has complained.

I'll get on it.

Status: Accepted
Labels: -Type-Defect -Priority-Medium Type-Task Priority-Low

jwang323 commented 9 years ago

From SolusStu...@gmail.com on July 25, 2011 14:35:42

I made the suggest change. Is this what you were expecting?

Status: Fixed

jwang323 commented 9 years ago

From sschuberth on July 26, 2011 00:41:29

Yes, thanks a lot.

jwang323 commented 9 years ago

From sschuberth on July 28, 2011 06:06:36

Sorry, I initially overlooked this, but "branch" should actually be called "branches".