Particles and their fluids in $f(R,T)$ gravity
**Authors**: P. P. Avelino
**TL;DR**: In alternative gravity theories like $f(R,T)$ gravity, where momentum isn't conserved in the Minkowski limit, the usual assumption that dust-like particles have zero pressure doesn't hold, which has implications for our understanding of ideal gases.
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04335)
The Square Kilometer Array as a Cosmic Microwave Background Experiment
**Authors**: David Zegeye, Thomas Crawford, Jens Chluba, Mathieu Remazeilles, Keith Grainge
**TL;DR**: "Using the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) to study the cosmic microwave background at radio wavelengths, we can improve constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity by combining SKA data with LiteBIRD mission data, even in the presence of variable low-frequency foregrounds."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04326)
Dynamics-based halo model for large scale structure
**Authors**: Edgar M. Salazar, Eduardo Rozo, Rafael García, 1 Nickolas Kokron, Susmita Adhikari, Benedikt Diemer, Calvin Osinga
**TL;DR**: "Accurate modeling of the one-to-two halo transition resolved by defining halos as particles orbiting their self-generated potential, separating orbiting and infalling particles, and resulting in a 2% accurate model for the halo-mass correlation function and power spectrum."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04054)
Calculating Bayesian evidence for inflationary models using CONNECT
**Authors**: Camilla T. G. Sørensen, Steen Hannestad, Andreas Nygaard, Thomas Tram
**TL;DR**: Researchers develop a new method using the CONNECT framework to efficiently calculate Bayesian evidence for cosmological models, reducing computation time from days to near-instant, making it possible to quickly compare and determine the best-fit models to explain cosmic data.
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03968)
Exploring loop-induced first-order electroweak phase transition in the Higgs effective field theory
**Authors**: Ricardo R. Florentino, Shinya Kanemura, Masanori Tanaka
**TL;DR**: Here is a TL;DR (Too Long; Didn't Read) summary of the paper:
"Researchers use a theoretical framework (naHEFT) to study how new particles could affect the Higgs boson's interactions and the early universe's electroweak phase transition. They find that precise measurements of the Higgs' interactions, gravitational waves, and searches for primordial black holes could reveal the nature of this transition and the underlying new physics."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03957)
Scaling solutions for current-carrying cosmic string networks
**Authors**: F. C. N. Q. Pimenta, C. J. A. P. Martins
**TL;DR**: "New model of cosmic string networks reveals three possible scaling solutions, depending on expansion rate and energy loss: (1) charges/currents decay, (2) they dominate network dynamics, or (3) full scaling is reached, with the last regime potentially matching the matter-dominated era."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03940)
Observational constraints on phenomenological emergent dark energy and barotropic dark matter characterized by a constant equation of state parameter
**Authors**: Jianqi Liu, Yanhong Yao, Yan Su, Jiawei Wu
**TL;DR**: "New dark matter model with barotropic fluid and emergent dark energy reduces Hubble and S8 tensions with observations, but Bayesian evidence still favors the original PEDE model."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03936)
Evolution of current-carrying string networks
**Authors**: J. R. C. C. C. Correia, C. J. A. P. Martins, F. C. N. Q. Pimenta
**TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper:
"Cosmic strings with extra 'superconducting' properties evolve differently in the early universe, affecting their observable signatures. We simulated these strings using large-scale field theory simulations and found that their evolution changes depending on the universe's expansion rate, with the matter-dominated era being the sweet spot for them to reach a stable state."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03931)
How much do we know the halo mass function? Predictions beyond resolution
**Authors**: Weiguang Cui
**TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper:
"Using different halo mass functions, this study explores the distribution of dark matter halos from galaxy cluster scales down to individual dark matter particles (GeV scale). Surprisingly, different fitting functions agree remarkably well, revealing a peak in the distribution at ~10^13 solar masses, suggesting galaxy groups dominate the total matter mass. The study also examines how changes in cosmology parameters affect these halo functions, which could help break degeneracies between these parameters."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03829)
Time delay of fast radio burst population with respect to the star formation history
**Authors**: Hai-Nan Lin, Xin-Yi Li, Rui Zou
**TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper:
"Using Bayesian analysis on the first CHIME/FRB catalog, we constrain the energy function and redshift distribution of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs). Our results suggest that FRBs lag behind the star formation history by 3-5 billion years, disfavoring the hypothesis that FRBs directly trace star formation."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03809)
A small cosmological constant from a large number of extra dimensions
**Authors**: Changjun Gao
**TL;DR**: In this paper, the authors use Lanczos-Lovelock gravity to show that a small, extra-dimensional sphere with a radius around the Planck length can cancel out a large, positive vacuum energy (cosmological constant), and that with ~69 extra dimensions, the model can produce a small, observationally-allowed cosmological constant.
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03687)
The Massive and Distant Clusters of WISE Survey 2: A Stacking Analysis Investigating the Evolution of Star Formation Rates and Stellar Masses in Groups and Clusters
**Authors**: A. Trudeau, Anthony H. Gonzalez, K. Thongkham, Kyoung-Soo Lee, Stacey Alberts, M. Brodwin, Thomas Connor, Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, Emily Moravec, Eshwar Puvvada, S. A. Stanford
**TL;DR**: Here's a concise summary of the paper:
"Environmental quenching of star formation in galaxy clusters kicks in abruptly at z~1.5, marking a rapid transition, with clusters' core regions showing a sharp drop in star formation rate relative to the field at this redshift."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03633)
Astrometric Search for Ultralight Dark Matter
**Authors**: Hyungjin Kim
**TL;DR**: "Precision astrometry could detect ultralight dark matter (mass: 10^-18 - 10^-16 eV) if it's thousands of times denser near the solar system than usual, with sensitivity comparable to pulsar timing arrays."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03539)
An Empirical Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distance Method in the Near Infrared. II. JWST NIRCam Wide Filters
**Authors**: Max J. B. Newman, Kristen B. W. McQuinn, Evan D. Skillman, Martha L. Boyer, Roger E. Cohen, Andrew E. Dolphin, O. Grace Telford
**TL;DR**: "Researchers develop a new method to standardize the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) distance measurement technique using James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) infrared filters, allowing for more precise distance measurements to galaxies up to 50 Mpc away, with filter combinations recommended for high-precision (≤1% in distance) and lower-precision (>1.5% in distance) applications."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03532)
Astrometric Detection of Ultralight Dark Matter
**Authors**: Jeff A. Dror, Sarunas Verner
**TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper:
"Astrometry can be used to directly detect ultralight dark matter with masses as low as 10^-33 eV by measuring its effect on the motion of quasars. Current surveys can detect dark matter with energy density as low as 3 x 10^-11 GeV/cm^3 if it's moving locally at 10^-3 velocity."
**Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03526)
Particles and their fluids in $f(R,T)$ gravity
**Authors**: P. P. Avelino **TL;DR**: In alternative gravity theories like $f(R,T)$ gravity, where momentum isn't conserved in the Minkowski limit, the usual assumption that dust-like particles have zero pressure doesn't hold, which has implications for our understanding of ideal gases. **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04335)The Square Kilometer Array as a Cosmic Microwave Background Experiment
**Authors**: David Zegeye, Thomas Crawford, Jens Chluba, Mathieu Remazeilles, Keith Grainge **TL;DR**: "Using the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) to study the cosmic microwave background at radio wavelengths, we can improve constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity by combining SKA data with LiteBIRD mission data, even in the presence of variable low-frequency foregrounds." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04326)Dynamics-based halo model for large scale structure
**Authors**: Edgar M. Salazar, Eduardo Rozo, Rafael García, 1 Nickolas Kokron, Susmita Adhikari, Benedikt Diemer, Calvin Osinga **TL;DR**: "Accurate modeling of the one-to-two halo transition resolved by defining halos as particles orbiting their self-generated potential, separating orbiting and infalling particles, and resulting in a 2% accurate model for the halo-mass correlation function and power spectrum." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04054)Calculating Bayesian evidence for inflationary models using CONNECT
**Authors**: Camilla T. G. Sørensen, Steen Hannestad, Andreas Nygaard, Thomas Tram **TL;DR**: Researchers develop a new method using the CONNECT framework to efficiently calculate Bayesian evidence for cosmological models, reducing computation time from days to near-instant, making it possible to quickly compare and determine the best-fit models to explain cosmic data. **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03968)Exploring loop-induced first-order electroweak phase transition in the Higgs effective field theory
**Authors**: Ricardo R. Florentino, Shinya Kanemura, Masanori Tanaka **TL;DR**: Here is a TL;DR (Too Long; Didn't Read) summary of the paper: "Researchers use a theoretical framework (naHEFT) to study how new particles could affect the Higgs boson's interactions and the early universe's electroweak phase transition. They find that precise measurements of the Higgs' interactions, gravitational waves, and searches for primordial black holes could reveal the nature of this transition and the underlying new physics." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03957)Scaling solutions for current-carrying cosmic string networks
**Authors**: F. C. N. Q. Pimenta, C. J. A. P. Martins **TL;DR**: "New model of cosmic string networks reveals three possible scaling solutions, depending on expansion rate and energy loss: (1) charges/currents decay, (2) they dominate network dynamics, or (3) full scaling is reached, with the last regime potentially matching the matter-dominated era." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03940)Observational constraints on phenomenological emergent dark energy and barotropic dark matter characterized by a constant equation of state parameter
**Authors**: Jianqi Liu, Yanhong Yao, Yan Su, Jiawei Wu **TL;DR**: "New dark matter model with barotropic fluid and emergent dark energy reduces Hubble and S8 tensions with observations, but Bayesian evidence still favors the original PEDE model." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03936)Evolution of current-carrying string networks
**Authors**: J. R. C. C. C. Correia, C. J. A. P. Martins, F. C. N. Q. Pimenta **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper: "Cosmic strings with extra 'superconducting' properties evolve differently in the early universe, affecting their observable signatures. We simulated these strings using large-scale field theory simulations and found that their evolution changes depending on the universe's expansion rate, with the matter-dominated era being the sweet spot for them to reach a stable state." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03931)How much do we know the halo mass function? Predictions beyond resolution
**Authors**: Weiguang Cui **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "Using different halo mass functions, this study explores the distribution of dark matter halos from galaxy cluster scales down to individual dark matter particles (GeV scale). Surprisingly, different fitting functions agree remarkably well, revealing a peak in the distribution at ~10^13 solar masses, suggesting galaxy groups dominate the total matter mass. The study also examines how changes in cosmology parameters affect these halo functions, which could help break degeneracies between these parameters." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03829)Time delay of fast radio burst population with respect to the star formation history
**Authors**: Hai-Nan Lin, Xin-Yi Li, Rui Zou **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "Using Bayesian analysis on the first CHIME/FRB catalog, we constrain the energy function and redshift distribution of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs). Our results suggest that FRBs lag behind the star formation history by 3-5 billion years, disfavoring the hypothesis that FRBs directly trace star formation." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03809)A small cosmological constant from a large number of extra dimensions
**Authors**: Changjun Gao **TL;DR**: In this paper, the authors use Lanczos-Lovelock gravity to show that a small, extra-dimensional sphere with a radius around the Planck length can cancel out a large, positive vacuum energy (cosmological constant), and that with ~69 extra dimensions, the model can produce a small, observationally-allowed cosmological constant. **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03687)The Massive and Distant Clusters of WISE Survey 2: A Stacking Analysis Investigating the Evolution of Star Formation Rates and Stellar Masses in Groups and Clusters
**Authors**: A. Trudeau, Anthony H. Gonzalez, K. Thongkham, Kyoung-Soo Lee, Stacey Alberts, M. Brodwin, Thomas Connor, Peter R. M. Eisenhardt, Emily Moravec, Eshwar Puvvada, S. A. Stanford **TL;DR**: Here's a concise summary of the paper: "Environmental quenching of star formation in galaxy clusters kicks in abruptly at z~1.5, marking a rapid transition, with clusters' core regions showing a sharp drop in star formation rate relative to the field at this redshift." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03633)Astrometric Search for Ultralight Dark Matter
**Authors**: Hyungjin Kim **TL;DR**: "Precision astrometry could detect ultralight dark matter (mass: 10^-18 - 10^-16 eV) if it's thousands of times denser near the solar system than usual, with sensitivity comparable to pulsar timing arrays." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03539)An Empirical Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distance Method in the Near Infrared. II. JWST NIRCam Wide Filters
**Authors**: Max J. B. Newman, Kristen B. W. McQuinn, Evan D. Skillman, Martha L. Boyer, Roger E. Cohen, Andrew E. Dolphin, O. Grace Telford **TL;DR**: "Researchers develop a new method to standardize the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) distance measurement technique using James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) infrared filters, allowing for more precise distance measurements to galaxies up to 50 Mpc away, with filter combinations recommended for high-precision (≤1% in distance) and lower-precision (>1.5% in distance) applications." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03532)Astrometric Detection of Ultralight Dark Matter
**Authors**: Jeff A. Dror, Sarunas Verner **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "Astrometry can be used to directly detect ultralight dark matter with masses as low as 10^-33 eV by measuring its effect on the motion of quasars. Current surveys can detect dark matter with energy density as low as 3 x 10^-11 GeV/cm^3 if it's moving locally at 10^-3 velocity." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03526)