guanyilun / arxiv-actions

MIT License
2 stars 1 forks source link

2024-05-29 astro-ph.CO #95

Open github-actions[bot] opened 1 month ago

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago
Pixel domain implementation of the Minimally Informed CMB MAp foreground Cleaning (MICMAC) method **Authors**: Magdy Morshed, Arianna Rizzieri, Clément Leloup, Josquin Errard, Radek Stompor **TL;DR**: "New method for separating astrophysical foregrounds from the cosmic microwave background (CMB) signal, allowing for spatial variability in foreground properties, and performing just as well as traditional techniques, even in complex scenarios." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18365)
Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: the final verdict on perturbation theory **Authors**: Andreas Ekstedt, Philipp Schicho, Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen **TL;DR**: Researchers calculate the thermodynamic properties of early universe phase transitions to unprecedented precision (N$^4$LO), enabling accurate predictions of gravitational waves produced during these events, and find surprising agreement with non-perturbative lattice simulations. **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18349)
Status of the LambdaCDM theory: supporting evidence and anomalies **Authors**: P. J. E. Peebles **TL;DR**: " LambdaCDM is a good enough theory, but it's not perfect - let's use its flaws to find an even better one!" **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18307)
Population III star formation in the presence of turbulence, magnetic fields and ionizing radiation feedback **Authors**: Piyush Sharda, Shyam H. Menon **TL;DR**: Here's a concise summary of the paper: "First-ever 3D simulations of Population III star formation incorporating turbulence, magnetic fields, and radiation feedback reveal that magnetic fields significantly slow down accretion and limit stellar masses to ~60M⊙, while ionizing feedback has a weaker impact, leading to the formation of star clusters in early universe dark matter minihaloes." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18265)
SubDLe: identification of substructures in cosmological simulations with deep learning **Authors**: Michela Esposito, Stefano Borgani, Giuseppe Murante **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper: "Researchers develop a fast and efficient algorithm, SubDLe, using deep learning (U-Net) and Friends-of-Friends algorithm to identify substructures (galaxies) within cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, reducing computational time and enabling integration with simulation codes for real-time galaxy identification." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18257)
Theoretical bounds on dark Higgs mass in a self-interacting dark matter model with $U(1)'$ **Authors**: Song Li, Jin Min Yang, Mengchao Zhang, Rui Zhu **TL;DR**: "New dark matter model with a spontaneous broken U(1)' gauge symmetry: dark matter mass 10-500 GeV, mediator mass 0.5-5 MeV, and dark Higgs mass 0.05-50 MeV, which can't be ignored in dark sector phenomenology." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18226)
A path towards constraining the evolution of the interstellar medium and outflows in the Milky Way using APOGEE **Authors**: Piyush Sharda, Yuan-Sen Ting, Niege Frankel **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "New model combines ISM and stellar disc models to study Milky Way's chemical evolution over the last 6 billion years, using APOGEE data. Finds that outflows have higher oxygen abundance than local ISM, and suggests elevated ISM turbulence, possibly driven by gas accretion, supernovae, or star formation efficiency." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18223)
SMART: spectral energy distributions Markov chain analysis with radiative transfer models **Authors**: Charalambia Varnava, Andreas Efstathiou **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary: "Meet SMART, a new open-source code for fitting galaxy spectral energy distributions (SEDs) using radiative transfer models. It's fast, Bayesian, and can handle UV to mm wavelengths, including Spitzer spectroscopy data. Tested on 42 local ULIRGs, SMART shows promise for studying galaxy evolution in the JWST era." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18130)
The Separate Universe approach for multifield inflation models **Authors**: Hugo Holland **TL;DR**: "Testing the accuracy of the 'separate universe approach' in multifield inflation models, crucial for predicting primordial black hole abundance, by comparing it to a full cosmological perturbation theory approach, to establish validity limits and conditions for its application in stochastic inflation." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18129)
Acoustic wake in an isothermal profile: dynamical friction and gravitational wave emission **Authors**: Gali Eytan, Vincent Desjacques, Robin Buehler **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper: "Dynamical friction on a moving object in a spherically symmetric system is suppressed at low velocities, but enhanced at high velocities, and can even produce a detectable gravitational wave signal if the object is a small black hole inspiraling into a massive one." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18117)
A$^3$COSMOS: Measuring the cosmic dust-attenuated star formation rate density at $4 < z < 5$ **Authors**: Benjamin Magnelli, Sylvia Adscheid, Tsan-Ming Wang, Laure Ciesla, Emanuele Daddi, Ivan Delvecchio, David Elbaz, Yoshinobu Fudamoto, Shuma Fukushima, Maximilien Franco, Carlos Gómez-Guijarro, Carlotta Gruppioni, Eric F. Jiménez-Andrade, Daizhong Liu, Pascal Oesch, Eva Schinnerer, Alberto Traina **TL;DR**: Using deep ALMA data and COSMOS2020 catalog, researchers studied star-forming galaxies at z~4.5, finding that they follow similar dust-attenuation patterns as local starbursts, but with lower dust attenuation in low-mass galaxies. The cosmic star formation rate density is dominated by galaxies with stellar masses around 10^9.5-10.5 Msun, and surprisingly, ~60-90% of the cosmic star formation rate density at this epoch is hidden by dust. **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18086)
Massive Black Hole Seeds **Authors**: John Regan, Marta Volonteri **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper: "New research suggests that the formation of supermassive black holes in galaxies is more likely to occur from smaller, "light" seeds rather than massive, "heavy" ones. The study argues that light seeds are 10^3 to 10^5 times more abundant than heavy seeds, making them a more plausible pathway for MBH formation. This challenges the traditional view of massive black hole formation and has implications for our understanding of galaxy evolution." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17975)
The effect of interstellar medium on LVK's black holes **Authors**: Sohan Ghodla **TL;DR**: The interstellar medium (ISM) surrounding wide binary black holes (BBHs) can significantly harden their orbits over billion-year timescales, particularly for more massive BBHs, and even drive their mergers, which could be an important pathway for some LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA detections. **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17863)
Strong-lensing cosmography using third-generation gravitational-wave detectors **Authors**: Souvik Jana, Shasvath J Kapadia, Tejaswi Venumadhav, Surhud More, Parameswaran Ajith **TL;DR**: Here is a TL;DR for the paper: "Use strong lensing of binary black hole mergers detected by 3rd-gen gravitational wave detectors to constrain cosmological parameters. Method is robust to BBH redshift distribution, but sensitive to lens property models; Bayesian model selection helps choose the best model, and contamination effects can be mitigated." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17805)
Manifestation of antiquark nuggets in collisions with the Earth **Authors**: V. V. Flambaum, I. B. Samsonov, G. K. Vong **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "Antiquark nuggets, hypothetical dark matter objects made of antimatter, could remain undetected if they're small enough. We constrained the possible properties of these nuggets by looking at neutrino flux from the Sun and Earth, and the lack of unusual seismic events. We found that they likely have a certain range of antibaryon charge and annihilation rates, but extremely large ones would cause explosive events on Earth, which we don't see." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17775)
Calibration Error in 21-centimeter Global Spectrum Experiments **Authors**: Shijie Sun, Eloy de Lera Acedo, Fengquan Wu, Bin Yue, Jiacong Zhu, Xuelei Chen **TL;DR**: "Accurate calibration of radio telescopes is crucial for detecting the faint 21cm signal from the cosmic dawn. This study shows how small measurement errors in instrument calibration can lead to significant errors (up to 200mK) in detecting this signal, which could be mistaken for the actual signal or distort the results." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17742)
A model-independent treatment of cosmic ladder calibration and $Ω_k$ measurement through low-$z$ observations **Authors**: Arianna Favale, Adrià Gómez-Valent, Marina Migliaccio **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "Researchers propose a model-independent method to measure the calibration of cosmic distance ladders using cosmic chronometers, supernovae, and baryon acoustic oscillations. They reconstruct the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae, curvature, and sound horizon scale at low redshifts, finding no significant evolution and constraining their values. While the uncertainties are still too large to resolve the Hubble tension, this method holds promise for future surveys." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17643)
The deceleration parameter in perturbed Bianchi universes with a "tilt" **Authors**: Amalia Tzartinoglou, Christos G. Tsagas **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "Misconceptions about the universe's expansion history can arise from relative motion between observers and their surroundings. We explored how this effect impacts measurements of cosmic acceleration/deceleration in various cosmological models, including Bianchi universes. Our findings suggest that relative motion can make observers think the universe is accelerating when it's not, and this effect is independent of the underlying cosmology, unless the universe is extremely anisotropic." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17592)
A deep-learning algorithm to disentangle self-interacting dark matter and AGN feedback models **Authors**: David Harvey **TL;DR**: Here's the TL;DR: "Researchers use machine learning to identify dark matter models in galaxy clusters, distinguishing them from astrophysical feedback effects. Trained on simulated images, the algorithm achieves 80% accuracy in identifying collisionless or self-interacting dark matter models, and is robust against observational errors." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17566)
Rescuing thermally under-abundant dark matter with a first-order phase transition **Authors**: Amit Adhikary, Debasish Borah, Satyabrata Mahapatra, Indrajit Saha, Narendra Sahu, Vicky Thounaojam **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper: "Thermally under-abundant dark matter can be revived by a first-order phase transition that changes the mediator mass, allowing the dark matter relic density to match observations. This scenario also provides a solution to small scale structure issues and predicts stochastic gravitational waves detectable by pulsar timing arrays like NANOGrav." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17564)
Stepping into the Forest: Confronting Interacting Radiation Models for the Hubble Tension with Lyman-$α$ Data **Authors**: Hengameh Bagherian, Melissa Joseph, Martin Schmaltz, Eashwar N. Sivarajan **TL;DR**: Here's a TL;DR for the paper: "Interacting dark radiation models can alleviate the Hubble tension, but do they hold up to large-scale structure (LSS) data? We test these models against weak lensing, CMB lensing, galaxy clustering, and Lyα forest data, finding that simplest models worsen the fit to Lyα data, but models with dark matter-dark radiation interactions can simultaneously resolve both Hubble and S8 tensions." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17554)
Resonant or asymmetric: The status of sub-GeV dark matter **Authors**: Sowmiya Balan, Csaba Balázs, Torsten Bringmann, Christopher Cappiello, Riccardo Catena, Timon Emken, Tomás E. Gonzalo, Taylor R. Gray, Will Handley, Quan Huynh, Felix Kahlhoefer, Aaron C. Vincent **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper: "Sub-GeV dark matter particles escape some strong constraints, but face new lab, astrophysical, and cosmological limits. This study combines all these constraints to analyze fermionic and scalar DM coupled to a dark photon. It finds viable regions near the dark photon resonance, with fermionic DM benefiting from particle-antiparticle asymmetry and scalar DM evading strong constraints even in symmetric cases. Bayesian analysis favors asymmetric fermionic DM and symmetric scalar DM over symmetric fermionic DM, and proposes new benchmark points for future experiments to target." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17548)
Om å kartleggja mørk materie med maskinlæring **Authors**: Hans Georg Schaathun, Ben David Normann, Kenny Solevåg-Hoti **TL;DR**: Here's a brief summary of the paper: "Using machine learning to simplify strong lens gravitational modeling: This paper combines the Roulette formalism with machine learning to automatically estimate lens potentials in strong gravitational lenses, making it faster and less tedious than traditional manual calculations." **Link**: [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17498)