Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
I'm usure about this. Git has a special subject line.
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 25 Jul 2014 at 2:06
Yeah, I realize that Git users like to follow a convention where they
distinguish between a subject (1st line) and additional commentation (All lines
after first line), however, I was thinking that it would be nice to see the
additional details or at least as much as fits in the viewable column width. I
was thinking that would allow for white space that takes place with short
subject lines to be filled with usable information.
The use-case example that we are running into in our dev-shop is where the
developer enters the following into their message when making a commit:
========================
Issue #4422
Fixed the widget with a gadget.
========================
Right now the git log only shows up as "Issue #4422" with a bunch of white
space that follows. I have to then click on it to see more meaning than the
number 4422 (which really does not mean anything without looking that number up
in another system). It would be nice to see "Issue #4422 Fixed the widget with
a gadget." all in the git log message column so that I can scan multiple commit
messages with my eye without having to click on each individually.
Maybe it would even make sense to have the subject part of the commit message
be in regular text and all additional text be italicized. This would allow for
the subject to be distinguished from the additional message.
Original comment by rburgsta...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2014 at 4:57
Just to point out one other thing (example). In the online commit log
(https://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/source/list), in the "Commit log
message" column , the subject is black and all additional lines in the message
are a gray color to differentiate the subject from the additional information.
Original comment by rburgsta...@gmail.com
on 4 Aug 2014 at 5:06
sstrickr...@googlemail.com , source tree for example already does that.
Maybe if we have a option to turn that functionality on/off?
Original comment by regisbsb...@gmail.com
on 6 May 2015 at 3:19
The second fix where the subject is in black and the additional comments in
gray would be a decent amount of work because I believe it would take some
capturing of the paint messages to change the color of the text. I was
planning to tackle this at some time and do a pull request.
I did manage to do the easy change which was to include subject as well as
additional comments on each log message separated by a "->". That change lives
in my automated nightly build process of the latest commits of this project.
If interested it is only two commits:
https://github.com/rburgstaler/TortoiseGit/tree/rpb/multi-line-log-message
By the way, a thumbs up to the TGit team. Great work for something you do in
your spare time.
Original comment by rburgsta...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 3:56
@rburgstaler: Feel free to open a pull-request (Please make sure the commits
have a signed-off-by line and do not introduce unnecessary changes (e.g.
whitespaces)).
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 9:11
I was going to do the exactly same but without the ->. Where do I open the pull
request? Github?
Original comment by regisbsb...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 11:16
Yeah, use GitHub (as you already have an account there).
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 11:42
Cool, done!
https://github.com/TortoiseGit/TortoiseGit/pull/182
Cheers!
Original comment by regisbsb...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 1:41
@sstrickr...@googlemail.com: I was wondering where your comments regarding the
whitespaces came from until I looked at the commits and saw that there are some
in there. I do not know how the whitespace got in there. Anyway...
Original comment by rburgsta...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 3:39
@rburgsta..@gmail.com I've shamelessly borrowed your code and created a pull
request without the whitespaces and the "->" if you don't mind :D
Original comment by regisbsb...@gmail.com
on 7 May 2015 at 3:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
rburgsta...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2014 at 11:09