Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Filtering out is not possible. However, you can click on the branch indicator
in the upper left and select the branches you want to see. For different visual
indicators we'd need concrete idea and proposal we can consider.
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 11 Apr 2015 at 11:44
I'm aware of the directory navigation in the left pane.
If you can apply visual indicators that differentiate branches from branch
directories, you can add a checkbox that filters away one of the two types? Or
maybe there is a misunderstanding?
https://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/source/browse/src/TortoiseProc/BrowseRefsD
lg.cpp?name=REL_1.8.9.0_EXTERNAL#608
https://code.google.com/p/tortoisegit/source/browse/src/TortoiseProc/BrowseRefsD
lg.cpp#577
When I browse CBrowseRefsDlg::FillListCtrlForShadowTree() in BrowseRefsDlg.cpp,
I see references to nodes and leaves, so the concept is present - but maybe not
the concept of branch subdirectories. (Just noticed the '!' option of the
filter BTW :)
The logic already includes the text filter (IsMatchFilter()). One could add
another (checkbox) filter that checks for the presence of '/' in CString ref,
which indicates that 'ref' is not a real "leaf" but a "deeper branch"; if the
checkbox is set, such "leaves" are simply not shown.
The checkbox could be called eg "show only end branches", one small issue is
that there is a mixup of terminology of Git branches and tree branches here.
Original comment by alexande...@gmail.com
on 12 Apr 2015 at 8:04
@alexander...
Now I see what you mean. At first I thought you are talking about the log
dialog.
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 25 Apr 2015 at 1:32
This issue was closed by revision 54737286f7ea.
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 25 Apr 2015 at 2:28
This issue was closed by revision 54737286f7ea.
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 15 May 2015 at 8:06
This issue was closed by revision 54737286f7ea.
Original comment by sstrickr...@googlemail.com
on 16 May 2015 at 2:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
alexande...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2015 at 7:42