Open zl9501 opened 3 years ago
hello,I also meet the same problem.And do you know why now?
I cannot recreate the reported results either
I ran the RPL official code for this split and the result is terrible, either. (Using 32x32 resolution)
63.0569111111111 | 61.4288777777778 | 64.7651666666667 | 60.7026888888889 | 62.0719888888889
AUROC for each split is like the above. And the average is 62.4051266666667.
Hi, thanks for your nice job.
I ran the training script provided in this repo, and did not change any code. However, there is a significant performance gap between the code and your paper (for example, 0.588 v.s. 0.715 AUROC on tinyimagenet).
Should I tune some learning parameters for increasing accuracy? I have tried to adjust the lr and epochs but it does not work. I am looking forward to your insightful suggestions for this.