Open kfontanez opened 4 years ago
Thank you for raising this issue. We will get back to you as soon as we can reproduce it.
Hi @kfontanez,
Thank you for reporting and sorry for the late reply. As I understand, your UMI part is the combination of Cellbarcode[8bp]+UMI[6bp], 14bp in total. Some questions:
Thank you!
Hello,
I am attempting to use Starcode-UMI with data produced from inDrops which has the structure Cellbarcode[8-12 bp]-fixed 22 bp sequence -Cellbarcode[8bp]-UMI[6bp]-PolyT.
I am able to cluster the UMI portion with a setting of 14 UMI bases but no matter how many bases I set seq-trim to the program hangs at the sequence clustering portion of the pipeline. I tried trimming every base following the first 14 bases so that the sequence clustering would have zero bases to work with and I also tried trimming nothing. In both cases, the program hangs at sequence clustering (I left it for over 14 hours with no progress). I'm running with 32 virtual cores and 64 Gb of RAM so I don't think it's a memory issue.
Here is what I ran: ./starcode-umi --umi-len 14 --umi-threads 8 --seq-threads 8 --umi-cluster s --seq-cluster s --umi-d 2 --seq-d 2 --seq-trim 15 ~/path/to/file/filename_R1.fastq
Here is the structure of the input sequence which is 51 bases long: TGACANTACTTGAGTGATTGCTTGTGACGCCTTAGTCCCTTCTTTTATTTT
I can get several thousand UMI clusters but the program hangs at sequencing clustering with a cluster of size 1 that never increases.
Has starcode ever been tested with inDrops data that has this cell barcode structure?
Thank you.