Create tech stack docs (techstack.yml and techstack.md)

stack-file[bot] commented 8 months ago

Adding tech stack documentation to allow anyone to easily see what is being used in this repo without digging through config files. Two files are being added: techstack.yml and techstack.md. techstack.yml contains data on all the technologies being used in this repo. techstack.md is a visualization of the YML file and displays the tech stack data in a pretty Markdown file.

💡 Protip: techstack.md contains a comment at the top of the file that the following README snippet (with and without the logos) at the top of the file as a comment:

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/CEPAberto is built on the following main stack:

.NET – Frameworks (Full Stack)
C# – Languages
Visual Studio – Integrated Development Environment
Shell – Shells
GitHub Actions – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/CEPAberto is built on the following main stack:

- [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- [Shell](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_script) – Shells
- [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/CEPAberto is built on the following main stack:

.NET – Frameworks (Full Stack)
C# – Languages
Visual Studio – Integrated Development Environment
Shell – Shells
GitHub Actions – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/CEPAberto is built on the following main stack:

- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1014/IoPy1dce_400x400.png' alt='.NET'/> [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1015/1200px-C_Sharp_wordmark.svg.png' alt='C#'/> [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1451/SR2hUhQN.png' alt='Visual Studio'/> [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/4631/default_c2062d40130562bdc836c13dbca02d318205a962.png' alt='Shell'/> [Shell](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_script) – Shells
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/11563/actions.png' alt='GitHub Actions'/> [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)

codacy-production[bot] commented 8 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for 246e90bd4e7e0b5d65ec3d044cd9d0754ec8f284[^1]	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (246e90bd4e7e0b5d65ec3d044cd9d0754ec8f284) | Report Missing | Report Missing | Report Missing | | | Head commit (251a9799ffd2ad3746b2e30e7398fd41f9e32da6) | 181 | 173 | 95.58% | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#112) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation} [^1]: Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 8 months ago

Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

AppVeyorBot commented 8 months ago

:white_check_mark: Build CEPAberto 4.0.74 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/CEPAberto/commit/07aec228e3 by @stacksharebot)

codecov[bot] commented 8 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (aa41579) 93.92% compared to head (ffb6d1f) 93.92%. Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Current head ffb6d1f differs from pull request most recent head 251a979. Consider uploading reports for the commit 251a979 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #112 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 93.92% 93.92% ======================================= Files 17 17 Lines 181 181 Branches 14 14 ======================================= Hits 170 170 Misses 8 8 Partials 3 3 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

AppVeyorBot commented 8 months ago

:x: Build CEPAberto 4.0.87 failed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/CEPAberto/commit/c6f38d89fa by @guibranco)

guibranco / CEPAberto