guibranco / CEPAberto

🇧🇷 :round_pushpin: CEPAberto API client wrapper for .NET projects
https://guibranco.github.io/CEPAberto/
MIT License
4 stars 4 forks source link

Remove .NET 7.0 from target frameworks #179

Closed guibranco closed 2 months ago

AppVeyorBot commented 2 months ago

:x: Build CEPAberto 4.0.407 failed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/CEPAberto/commit/79e0c044da by @guibranco)

gitguardian[bot] commented 2 months ago

⚠️ GitGuardian has uncovered 1 secret following the scan of your pull request.

Please consider investigating the findings and remediating the incidents. Failure to do so may lead to compromising the associated services or software components.

🔎 Detected hardcoded secret in your pull request
| GitGuardian id | GitGuardian status | Secret | Commit | Filename | | | -------------- | ------------------ | ------------------------------ | ---------------- | --------------- | -------------------- | | [5444983](https://dashboard.gitguardian.com/workspace/7014/incidents/5444983?occurrence=160736906) | Triggered | Generic High Entropy Secret | 58462f9888173919a0af416a8e48e13b1d848f66 | Tests/CEPAberto.Tests/CEPAbertoClientTest.cs | [View secret](https://github.com/guibranco/CEPAberto/commit/58462f9888173919a0af416a8e48e13b1d848f66#diff-9c8fef13f09ea1f1098a957eba172dbb2cab9a3482a4a965bade065bedbdee23L5) |
🛠 Guidelines to remediate hardcoded secrets
1. Understand the implications of revoking this secret by investigating where it is used in your code. 2. Replace and store your secret safely. [Learn here](https://blog.gitguardian.com/secrets-api-management?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) the best practices. 3. Revoke and [rotate this secret](https://docs.gitguardian.com/secrets-detection/secrets-detection-engine/detectors/generics/generic_high_entropy_secret#revoke-the-secret?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment). 4. If possible, [rewrite git history](https://blog.gitguardian.com/rewriting-git-history-cheatsheet?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment). Rewriting git history is not a trivial act. You might completely break other contributing developers' workflow and you risk accidentally deleting legitimate data. To avoid such incidents in the future consider - following these [best practices](https://blog.gitguardian.com/secrets-api-management/?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) for managing and storing secrets including API keys and other credentials - install [secret detection on pre-commit](https://docs.gitguardian.com/ggshield-docs/integrations/git-hooks/pre-commit?utm_source=product&utm_medium=GitHub_checks&utm_campaign=check_run_comment) to catch secret before it leaves your machine and ease remediation.

🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.

codacy-production[bot] commented 2 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) :white_check_mark:
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (8ebb1a8472c9654cb602ee0a202326a2870929d4) | 181 | 9 | 4.97% | | | Head commit (58462f9888173919a0af416a8e48e13b1d848f66) | 181 (+0) | 9 (+0) | 4.97% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#179) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences


:rocket: Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

AppVeyorBot commented 2 months ago

:white_check_mark: Build CEPAberto 4.0.436 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/CEPAberto/commit/8c544b26c3 by @guibranco)

codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 4.41%. Comparing base (8ebb1a8) to head (58462f9).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #179 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 4.41% 4.41% ===================================== Files 17 17 Lines 181 181 Branches 14 14 ===================================== Hits 8 8 Misses 172 172 Partials 1 1 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.