guibranco / PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet

🇧🇷 :bank: :gear: PIX/SPI contracts from @bacen/pix-api/
https://guibranco.github.io/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet/
MIT License
21 stars 7 forks source link

Bump csharpier from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2 #130

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 1 month ago

dependabot[bot] commented 1 month ago

Bumps csharpier from 0.29.1 to 0.29.2.

Release notes

Sourced from csharpier's releases.

0.29.2

What's Changed

Comments don't follow tabs indent style #1343

Prior to 0.29.2 CSharpier was converting any tabs within the block of a multiline comment to spaces.

public void SomeFunction()
{
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by one tab. (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by 4 spaces but will be converted to 1 tab (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
       This line is indented by 3 spaces but will be left as 3 spaces
    */
}

csharpier-ignore-start now supported in object initializers #1342

// input & expected output
return new SomeClass
{
    // csharpier-ignore-start
    SomeProperty =     someValue,
    SomeProperty2 =     someValue
    // csharpier-ignore-end
};

// 0.29.1
return new SomeClass
{
// csharpier-ignore-start
SomeProperty = someValue,
SomeProperty2 = someValue
// csharpier-ignore-end
};

Fixed extra new line between cast and collection expression. #1334

// input & expected output
CallMethod(
    (string[])
        [
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from csharpier's changelog.

# 0.29.2

What's Changed

Comments don't follow tabs indent style #1343

Prior to 0.29.2 CSharpier was converting any tabs within the block of a multiline comment to spaces.

public void SomeFunction()
{
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by one tab. (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
        This line is indented by 4 spaces but will be converted to 1 tab (prior to 0.29.2 this would end up as a tab followed by 4 spaces)
    */
    /*
    The following line is an example with an indent:
       This line is indented by 3 spaces but will be left as 3 spaces
    */
}

csharpier-ignore-start now supported in object initializers #1342

// input & expected output
return new SomeClass
{
    // csharpier-ignore-start
    SomeProperty =     someValue,
    SomeProperty2 =     someValue
    // csharpier-ignore-end
};

// 0.29.1
return new SomeClass
{
// csharpier-ignore-start
SomeProperty = someValue,
SomeProperty2 = someValue
// csharpier-ignore-end
};

Fixed extra new line between cast and collection expression. #1334

// input & expected output
CallMethod(
    (string[])
        [
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
            longerValue_____________________________________________,
</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 57c3ca1 Releasing 0.29.2 (#1347)
  • 861f281 Support custom file extensions with editor config (#1346)
  • e90022e fixing issue when formatting with tabs that would convert tabs in com… (#1344)
  • 3fd7faa Adding support for csharpier-ignore-start in object initializers (#1345)
  • 8bca3ce fixing issue with extra line before collection expression within a ca… (#1335)
  • 4d51407 Tweak the logic around validating installs so it doesn't bomb out and… (#1339)
  • 12fb058 Possible fix for issue on osx (#1338)
  • 90c6c28 proper indent size
  • See full diff in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
guibranco commented 1 month ago

@dependabot squash and merge

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

6:36AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:36AM INF 152 commits scanned.
6:36AM INF scan completed in 107ms
6:36AM INF no leaks found
codacy-production[bot] commented 1 month ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%) :white_check_mark:
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (5a19c12f3a13e97e21fb769eec41f8d447b6788e) | 75 | 1 | 1.33% | | | Head commit (895095a1604eef186d1687f8916ab5382e288c90) | 75 (+0) | 1 (+0) | 1.33% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#130) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

AppVeyorBot commented 1 month ago

:white_check_mark: Build PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet 1.1.393 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet/commit/5bd52181f1 by @dependabot[bot])

codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 1.33%. Comparing base (5a19c12) to head (895095a). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #130 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 1.33% 1.33% ===================================== Files 17 17 Lines 75 75 ===================================== Hits 1 1 Misses 74 74 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.