stack-file[bot] commented 9 months ago

Adding tech stack documentation to allow anyone to easily see what is being used in this repo without digging through config files. Two files are being added: techstack.yml and techstack.md. techstack.yml contains data on all the technologies being used in this repo. techstack.md is a visualization of the YML file and displays the tech stack data in a pretty Markdown file.

💡 Protip: techstack.md contains a comment at the top of the file that the following README snippet (with and without the logos) at the top of the file as a comment:

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

.NET – Frameworks (Full Stack)
C# – Languages
Visual Studio – Integrated Development Environment
Moq – Testing Frameworks
xUnit – Testing Frameworks
.NET Core – Frameworks (Full Stack)
ASP.NET Core – Frameworks (Full Stack)
GitHub Actions – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

- [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- [Moq](https://github.com/Moq/moq4) – Testing Frameworks
- [xUnit](http://xunit.github.io/) – Testing Frameworks
- [.NET Core](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [ASP.NET Core](docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

.NET – Frameworks (Full Stack)
C# – Languages
Visual Studio – Integrated Development Environment
Moq – Testing Frameworks
xUnit – Testing Frameworks
.NET Core – Frameworks (Full Stack)
ASP.NET Core – Frameworks (Full Stack)
GitHub Actions – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1014/IoPy1dce_400x400.png' alt='.NET'/> [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1015/1200px-C_Sharp_wordmark.svg.png' alt='C#'/> [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1451/SR2hUhQN.png' alt='Visual Studio'/> [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1628/1434934.png' alt='Moq'/> [Moq](https://github.com/Moq/moq4) – Testing Frameworks
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/3077/ca5a327feb49ddfe1f4b11548907e5a1_400x400.png' alt='xUnit'/> [xUnit](http://xunit.github.io/) – Testing Frameworks
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/6403/default_91fc1f0ee315262794273aa1387eaf8fed8436e6.png' alt='.NET Core'/> [.NET Core](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/11331/asp.net-core.png' alt='ASP.NET Core'/> [ASP.NET Core](docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/11563/actions.png' alt='GitHub Actions'/> [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)

github-actions[bot] commented 9 months ago

Qodana for .NET

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked ☁️ View the detailed Qodana report

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at [qodana-support@jetbrains.com](mailto:qodana-support@jetbrains.com) - Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue - Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

codecov[bot] commented 9 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (9aa5a54) 1.33% compared to head (4612b14) 1.33%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #85 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 1.33% 1.33% ===================================== Files 17 17 Lines 75 75 ===================================== Hits 1 1 Misses 74 74 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

codacy-production[bot] commented 9 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00%	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (9aa5a549ddbbd23f5a37488744e51f1d6f2b0e87) | 75 | 1 | 1.33% | | | Head commit (4612b1422793f3284e9ff726ddd4f8a8ed09b8a0) | 75 (+0) | 1 (+0) | 1.33% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#85) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`