guibranco / PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet

🇧🇷 :bank: :gear: PIX/SPI contracts from @bacen/pix-api/
https://guibranco.github.io/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet/
MIT License
21 stars 7 forks source link

Create tech stack docs (techstack.yml and techstack.md) #90

Closed stack-file[bot] closed 10 months ago

stack-file[bot] commented 10 months ago

Adding tech stack documentation to allow anyone to easily see what is being used in this repo without digging through config files. Two files are being added: techstack.yml and techstack.md. techstack.yml contains data on all the technologies being used in this repo. techstack.md is a visualization of the YML file and displays the tech stack data in a pretty Markdown file.

💡 Protip: techstack.md contains a comment at the top of the file that the following README snippet (with and without the logos) at the top of the file as a comment:

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

- [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- [Moq](https://github.com/Moq/moq4) – Testing Frameworks
- [xUnit](http://xunit.github.io/) – Testing Frameworks
- [.NET Core](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [ASP.NET Core](docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1014/IoPy1dce_400x400.png' alt='.NET'/> [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1015/1200px-C_Sharp_wordmark.svg.png' alt='C#'/> [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1451/SR2hUhQN.png' alt='Visual Studio'/> [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1628/1434934.png' alt='Moq'/> [Moq](https://github.com/Moq/moq4) – Testing Frameworks
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/3077/ca5a327feb49ddfe1f4b11548907e5a1_400x400.png' alt='xUnit'/> [xUnit](http://xunit.github.io/) – Testing Frameworks
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/6403/default_91fc1f0ee315262794273aa1387eaf8fed8436e6.png' alt='.NET Core'/> [.NET Core](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/11331/asp.net-core.png' alt='ASP.NET Core'/> [ASP.NET Core](docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/11563/actions.png' alt='GitHub Actions'/> [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)
sonarcloud[bot] commented 10 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

AppVeyorBot commented 10 months ago

:white_check_mark: Build PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet 1.1.223 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet/commit/752cfc1e8c by @stacksharebot)

codacy-production[bot] commented 10 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% :white_check_mark: ∅
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (20208da976fcad69a85b9fca66f06000e14f7fbb) | 75 | 1 | 1.33% | | | Head commit (7c3bd3cbad52b5c41f81c97b8ae67997f23f4517) | 75 (+0) | 1 (+0) | 1.33% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#90) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation

codecov[bot] commented 10 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (20208da) 1.33% compared to head (7c3bd3c) 1.33%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #90 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 1.33% 1.33% ===================================== Files 17 17 Lines 75 75 ===================================== Hits 1 1 Misses 74 74 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.