guibranco / PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet

🇧🇷 :bank: :gear: PIX/SPI contracts from @bacen/pix-api/
https://guibranco.github.io/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet/
MIT License
20 stars 7 forks source link

Create tech stack docs (techstack.yml and techstack.md) #90

Closed stack-file[bot] closed 8 months ago

stack-file[bot] commented 8 months ago

Adding tech stack documentation to allow anyone to easily see what is being used in this repo without digging through config files. Two files are being added: techstack.yml and techstack.md. techstack.yml contains data on all the technologies being used in this repo. techstack.md is a visualization of the YML file and displays the tech stack data in a pretty Markdown file.

💡 Protip: techstack.md contains a comment at the top of the file that the following README snippet (with and without the logos) at the top of the file as a comment:

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet without images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

- [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- [Moq](https://github.com/Moq/moq4) – Testing Frameworks
- [xUnit](http://xunit.github.io/) – Testing Frameworks
- [.NET Core](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [ASP.NET Core](docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images Start --->

Tech Stack

guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

Full tech stack here

<--- Readme.md Snippet with images End --->

Get the code:

## Tech Stack
guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet is built on the following main stack:

- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1014/IoPy1dce_400x400.png' alt='.NET'/> [.NET](http://www.microsoft.com/net/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1015/1200px-C_Sharp_wordmark.svg.png' alt='C#'/> [C#](http://csharp.net) – Languages
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1451/SR2hUhQN.png' alt='Visual Studio'/> [Visual Studio](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718325.aspx) – Integrated Development Environment
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/1628/1434934.png' alt='Moq'/> [Moq](https://github.com/Moq/moq4) – Testing Frameworks
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/3077/ca5a327feb49ddfe1f4b11548907e5a1_400x400.png' alt='xUnit'/> [xUnit](http://xunit.github.io/) – Testing Frameworks
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/6403/default_91fc1f0ee315262794273aa1387eaf8fed8436e6.png' alt='.NET Core'/> [.NET Core](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/11331/asp.net-core.png' alt='ASP.NET Core'/> [ASP.NET Core](docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/) – Frameworks (Full Stack)
- <img width='25' height='25' src='https://img.stackshare.io/service/11563/actions.png' alt='GitHub Actions'/> [GitHub Actions](https://github.com/features/actions) – Continuous Integration

Full tech stack [here](/techstack.md)
sonarcloud[bot] commented 8 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

AppVeyorBot commented 8 months ago

:white_check_mark: Build PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet 1.1.223 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/PIX-BACEN-SDK-dotnet/commit/752cfc1e8c by @stacksharebot)

codacy-production[bot] commented 8 months ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% :white_check_mark: ∅
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (20208da976fcad69a85b9fca66f06000e14f7fbb) | 75 | 1 | 1.33% | | | Head commit (7c3bd3cbad52b5c41f81c97b8ae67997f23f4517) | 75 (+0) | 1 (+0) | 1.33% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#90) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation

codecov[bot] commented 8 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (20208da) 1.33% compared to head (7c3bd3c) 1.33%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #90 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 1.33% 1.33% ===================================== Files 17 17 Lines 75 75 ===================================== Hits 1 1 Misses 74 74 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.