Bump Moq from 4.20.70 to 4.20.72

dependabot[bot] commented 1 week ago

Bumps Moq from 4.20.70 to 4.20.72.

Release notes

v4.20.72

What's Changed

🔨 Other

Remove unused attribute by @kzu in devlooped/moq#1515

Full Changelog: https://github.com/devlooped/moq/compare/v4.20.71...v4.20.72

v4.20.71

What's Changed

🔨 Other

Update License.txt to use SPDX identifier for automatic recognition by @georg-eckert-zeiss in devlooped/moq#1471

Additional Verify overload by @bkijonka in devlooped/moq#1463

Fix semantic error in MatchersFixture.cs test by @go-hoon in devlooped/moq#1496

Remove spurious unmerged change comment from dotnet format by @kzu in devlooped/moq#1499

New Contributors

@georg-eckert-zeiss made their first contribution in devlooped/moq#1471

@bkijonka made their first contribution in devlooped/moq#1463

@go-hoon made their first contribution in devlooped/moq#1496

Full Changelog: https://github.com/devlooped/moq/compare/v4.20.70...v4.20.71

Changelog

Sourced from Moq's changelog.

v4.20.72 (2024-09-07)

Full Changelog

:hammer: Other:

Question: Sponsorable Attribute in release v4.20.71 #1513

:twisted_rightwards_arrows: Merged:

Remove unused attribute #1515 (@kzu)

v4.20.71 (2024-09-03)

Full Changelog

:bug: Fixed bugs:

Documentation link gives 404 #1495

Documentation link is broken #1487

:hammer: Other:

Documentation Unavailable Online #1473

Some source code files is filled with comments like: "Unmerged change from project " #1451

Question: would it make sense to call verify all on a strict mock when the mock gets disposed? #1440

SponsorLink Integration Makes Moq Unuasable due to PII and GDPR Requirements #1433

Default value ILookup<> in loose mode is null #1391

Verifying a protected method when the exact parameter types are not statically known #1339

:twisted_rightwards_arrows: Merged:

Remove spurious unmerged change comment from dotnet format #1499 (@kzu)

Fix semantic error in MatchersFixture.cs test #1496 (@go-hoon)

Update License.txt to use SPDX identifier for automatic recognition #1471 (@georg-eckert-zeiss)

Additional Verify overload #1463 (@bkijonka)

Commits

959fc51 Remove unused attribute
ede9996 ⬆️ Bump files with dotnet-file sync
f8db318 🖉 Update changelog with v4.20.71
aecc471 ⬆️ Bump files with dotnet-file sync
99d243b Fix whitespace in test project
ac56c3d Fix repo variable actions context
ac3a8aa Prereleases ship only to CI feed
ea92109 Bump Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions in the extensions group
4bdb19a Remove SourceLink which is now built-in the SDK
c0a33bd Use windows agent for build, variable for publish
Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

guibranco commented 1 week ago

@dependabot squash and merge

codacy-production[bot] commented 1 week ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (dc214616948635e84d993d935464a518ee96ac10) | 9566 | 2 | 0.02% | | | Head commit (cf20e89ec29ba69d386658aff0cf3af5a508358a) | 9566 (+0) | 2 (+0) | 0.02% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#304) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

AppVeyorBot commented 1 week ago

:white_check_mark: Build Sankhya-SDK-dotnet 3.0.754 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/Sankhya-SDK-dotnet/commit/fe75d40489 by @dependabot[bot])

codecov[bot] commented 1 week ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 0.02%. Comparing base (dc21461) to head (cf20e89). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #304 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 0.02% 0.02% ===================================== Files 158 158 Lines 9566 9566 Branches 757 757 ===================================== Hits 2 2 + Misses 9564 9562 -2 - Partials 0 2 +2 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

4:50AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
4:50AM INF 327 commits scanned.
4:50AM INF scan completed in 328ms
4:50AM INF no leaks found

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 week ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

AppVeyorBot commented 1 week ago

:white_check_mark: Build Sankhya-SDK-dotnet 3.0.762 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/Sankhya-SDK-dotnet/commit/d8d8e53f6d by @gstraccini[bot])

guibranco / Sankhya-SDK-dotnet