GitAuto: [FEATURE] Implement Brand Subcollection API

gitauto-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Resolves #42

What is the feature

Implement the Brand Subcollection API, enabling the association and disassociation of subcollections to brands. This feature allows for more granular organization of brands within the catalog, enhancing the ability to categorize and manage products effectively.

Why we need the feature

Currently, the system lacks the capability to associate subcollections with brands, limiting the flexibility in organizing and displaying brand-specific product groupings. By introducing the Brand Subcollection API, administrators can better structure their catalog, improve navigation for end-users, and facilitate targeted marketing strategies based on subcollection affiliations.

How to implement and why

API Endpoints:
- Associate Subcollection: Create a POST endpoint at Src/Controllers/BrandController.cs to handle the association of a subcollection to a brand.
- Disassociate Subcollection: Create a DELETE endpoint at the same controller to handle the removal of a subcollection from a brand.
Data Models:
- Update the Brand model in Src/Models/Brand.cs to include a collection property for subcollections.
- Define a Subcollection model if not already present, ensuring it includes necessary identifiers and relationships.
Database Migrations:
- Implement migrations in Src/Migrations to modify the database schema, establishing a many-to-many relationship between brands and subcollections.
Business Logic:
- In Src/Services/BrandService.cs, add methods to handle the logic for associating and disassociating subcollections, ensuring data integrity and handling edge cases.
Validation:
- Implement input validation in the controllers to ensure that provided brand and subcollection IDs exist and that associations do not violate any business rules.
Testing:
- Develop unit tests in Tests/BrandServiceTests.cs to verify the business logic.
- Create integration tests in Tests/BrandControllerTests.cs to ensure the API endpoints function as expected.
Documentation:
- Update the API documentation in the docs directory to include the new endpoints, detailing request and response formats.
Configuration:
- If necessary, update any configuration files in .config or related directories to accommodate new settings or dependencies introduced by the feature.

This step-by-step implementation ensures a comprehensive integration of the Brand Subcollection API, adhering to best practices and maintaining system integrity.

About backward compatibility

The introduction of the Brand Subcollection API adds new endpoints and data structures without modifying existing ones. This ensures that current functionalities remain unaffected, maintaining backward compatibility. Consumers of the API can continue using existing endpoints without any required changes, while new features are accessible through the additional endpoints. Proper versioning and documentation further support a smooth transition and integration.

Test these changes locally

git checkout -b gitauto/issue-42-9939a2dd-9466-4bde-a401-2b2213a7c6d5
git pull origin gitauto/issue-42-9939a2dd-9466-4bde-a401-2b2213a7c6d5

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

gitauto-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Committed the Check Run CodeFactor error fix! Running it again...

gitauto-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Committed the Check Run linter-check error fix! Running it again...

codacy-production[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (2901efda9ab6c2c9e93a46e2007f014a5b1364cc) | 1774 | 4 | 0.23% | | | Head commit (4bdc5552853e270402bff46139f6a1ae3f13064d) | 1774 (+0) | 4 (+0) | 0.23% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#343) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

AppVeyorBot commented 3 weeks ago

:white_check_mark: Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.1257 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/VTEX-SDK-dotnet/commit/b2b63a93c0 by @gitauto-ai[bot])

codecov[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 0.22%. Comparing base (2901efd) to head (9f8bd40). Report is 35 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #343 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 0.22% 0.22% ===================================== Files 117 117 Lines 1774 1774 Branches 75 75 ===================================== Hits 4 4 + Misses 1770 1768 -2 - Partials 0 2 +2 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

gitauto-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Committed the Check Run Codacy Static Code Analysis error fix! Running it again...

github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

```txt 12:12AM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 12:12AM INF 371 commits scanned. 12:12AM INF scan completed in 264ms 12:12AM INF no leaks found ```

codacy-production[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (2901efda9ab6c2c9e93a46e2007f014a5b1364cc) | 1774 | 4 | 0.23% | | | Head commit (9f8bd40560efc72153736200cdbed66ac7943ca4) | 1774 (+0) | 4 (+0) | 0.23% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#343) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`