search

guibranco / VTEX-SDK-dotnet

🛒 ⚙️ VTEX platform .NET SDK
https://guibranco.github.io/VTEX-SDK-dotnet/
MIT License
12 stars 7 forks source link

Create Directory.Build.props #368

Closed guibranco closed 1 week ago

guibranco commented 1 week ago

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

ℹ Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 week ago

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new Directory.Build.props file for .NET projects, establishing various project properties and settings. This includes enabling version updates, documentation generation, and specific configurations for symbols and warnings. Additionally, an analysis settings group is added, and package references for StyleCop.Analyzers and SonarAnalyzer.CSharp are included, conditioned to apply only to non-test C# projects.

Changes

File Change Summary
Directory.Build.props - New property group defining project settings such as version updates, documentation generation, and symbol package format.
- Added analysis settings group with the latest recommended level.
- New item group with package references for StyleCop.Analyzers and SonarAnalyzer.CSharp for non-test projects.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, Review effort [1-5]: 2

Suggested reviewers

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A file to guide, dispelling gloom.
Properties set, the project sings,
With analyzers and symbols, oh, the joy it brings!
Hop along, let’s build anew,
In the world of code, there's much to do! 🌼

📜 Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**
📥 Commits Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1357cefb790d8de60831ce6b0314a27e57d7ee1e and 4c92da36bed62affa1871c3d00de93dcd959b728.
📒 Files selected for processing (1) * `Directory.Build.props` (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1) * Directory.Build.props

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
github-actions[bot] commented 1 week ago

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs ```txt 1:40PM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 1:40PM INF 559 commits scanned. 1:40PM INF scan completed in 303ms 1:40PM INF no leaks found ```
sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 week ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

AppVeyorBot commented 1 week ago

:white_check_mark: Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.1673 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/VTEX-SDK-dotnet/commit/1e59aad92a by @guibranco)

codacy-production[bot] commented 1 week ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 1357cefb790d8de60831ce6b0314a27e57d7ee1e[^1] :white_check_mark: ∅
Coverage variation details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (1357cefb790d8de60831ce6b0314a27e57d7ee1e) | Report Missing | Report Missing | Report Missing | | | Head commit (4c92da36bed62affa1871c3d00de93dcd959b728) | 1774 | 4 | 0.23% | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `
Diff coverage details | | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#368) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more [^1]: Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

codecov[bot] commented 1 week ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 0.22%. Comparing base (609f2aa) to head (4c92da3). Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #368 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 0.22% 0.22% ===================================== Files 117 117 Lines 1774 1774 Branches 75 75 ===================================== Hits 4 4 + Misses 1770 1768 -2 - Partials 0 2 +2 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.