Bump csharpier from 0.29.2 to 0.30.1

dependabot[bot] commented 4 days ago

Bumps csharpier from 0.29.2 to 0.30.1.

Release notes

0.30.0

Breaking Changes

The CSharpier dotnet tool no longer supports net6 & net7.

What's Changed

Support C# 13 & dotnet 9. #1318

CSharpier now supports dotnet 9 along with formatting all C# 13 language features.

Inconsistent Formatting for new() Operator Compared to Explicit Object Constructors #1364

Implicit and explicit object initialization with constructors was not formatted consistently
// input & expected output
SomeObject someObject = new(
    someLongParameter___________________,
    someLongParameter___________________
)
{
    Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,
};
SomeObject someObject = new SomeObject(

someLongParameter___________________,

someLongParameter___________________

)

{

Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,

};
// 0.29.2

SomeObject someObject =

new(someLongParameter___________________, someLongParameter___________________)

{

Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,

};
SomeObject someObject = new SomeObject(

someLongParameter___________________,

someLongParameter___________________

)

{

Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,

};
Adds additional space before each member access in verbatim interpolated multiline string #1358

When an interpolated verbatim string contained line breaks, the code within the interpolations would contain extra spaces.
// input & expected output
var someStringWithLineBreakAndLongValue =
    $@"
{someValue.GetValue().Name} someLongText________________________________________________________________";
</tr></table>

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from csharpier's changelog.

# 0.30.1

What's Changed

Revert tool command back to dotnet-csharpier, it was supposed to be changed to csharpier for 1.0.0

0.30.0

Breaking Changes

The CSharpier dotnet tool no longer supports net6 & net7.

What's Changed

Support C# 13 & dotnet 9. #1318

CSharpier now supports dotnet 9 along with formatting all C# 13 language features.

Inconsistent Formatting for new() Operator Compared to Explicit Object Constructors #1364

Implicit and explicit object initialization with constructors was not formatted consistently
// input & expected output
SomeObject someObject = new(
    someLongParameter___________________,
    someLongParameter___________________
)
{
    Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,
};
SomeObject someObject = new SomeObject(

someLongParameter___________________,

someLongParameter___________________

)

{

Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,

};
// 0.29.2

SomeObject someObject =

new(someLongParameter___________________, someLongParameter___________________)

{

Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,

};
SomeObject someObject = new SomeObject(

someLongParameter___________________,

someLongParameter___________________

)

{

Property = longValue_______________________________________________________________________,

};
Adds additional space before each member access in verbatim interpolated multiline string #1358

When an interpolated verbatim string contained line breaks, the code within the interpolations would contain extra spaces.
// input & expected output
</tr></table> 

... (truncated)

Commits

fedc791 Releasing 0.30.1 (#1384)
6375fab revert tool command, this was supposed to be in 1.0.0 only (#1383)
0425539 Releasing 0.30.0 (#1381)
4dfa243 Ensure we are ready for the next major version. (#1380)
1c76620 Update Editors.md with conform.nvim suggestion for Neovim (#1379)
cfb0a03 use 0.29.2 and fix the 0.0.1 warning
91bbafb Fixing extra line + indent with collection expression on fields (#1371)
b14d79f Fixing issue with a trailing comma being added after a trailing comment (#1370)
13cd0c0 fix: remove extra hyphen in troubleshooting step file (#1372)
42622cd fix extra space being added in invocation that is inside verbatim str… (#1373)
Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

coderabbitai[bot] commented 4 days ago

[!IMPORTANT]

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

github-actions[bot] commented 4 days ago

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

```txt 2:32PM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 2:32PM INF 330 commits scanned. 2:32PM INF scan completed in 241ms 2:32PM INF no leaks found ```

guibranco commented 4 days ago

@dependabot squash and merge

codacy-production[bot] commented 4 days ago

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: ∅

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (4ad54d0dc6712e41a952be6b48d4bf152976d197) | 1777 | 4 | 0.23% | | | Head commit (ced0d97e51ce3d7a7282af031053047f8f70f6a3) | 1777 (+0) | 4 (+0) | 0.23% (**+0.00%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#381) | 0 | 0 | **∅ (not applicable)** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 days ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

AppVeyorBot commented 4 days ago

:white_check_mark: Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.4.35 completed (commit https://github.com/guibranco/VTEX-SDK-dotnet/commit/2c58a03685 by @dependabot[bot])

codecov[bot] commented 4 days ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 0.22%. Comparing base (4ad54d0) to head (ced0d97). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #381 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 0.22% 0.22% ===================================== Files 117 117 Lines 1777 1777 Branches 75 75 ===================================== Hits 4 4 + Misses 1773 1771 -2 - Partials 0 2 +2 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

guibranco / VTEX-SDK-dotnet