Enhance pull request status checking in comments.php

[guibranco]

Description

• Added a check for the status code of the pull request response to ensure it is 200.
• Improved the function's robustness by returning false if the pull request is not open.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	comments.php Enhance pull request status checking                                          src/comments.php Added a status code check for pull request response. Improved error handling by returning false for non-200 status codes. +3/-0

[deepsource-io[bot]]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 1e7be4f..a868722. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and involve a simple status code check with minimal complexity.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

9:54PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
9:54PM INF 413 commits scanned.
9:54PM INF scan completed in 116ms
9:54PM INF no leaks found

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add error checking for JSON decoding to handle invalid responses ___ **Ensure that the json_decode function is checked for errors, as it may return null if the JSON is invalid.** [Src/comments.php [502]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/475/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR502-R502) ```diff $pullRequest = json_decode($pullRequestResponse->body); +if (json_last_error() !== JSON_ERROR_NONE) { + // Handle JSON decode error appropriately + return false; +} ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses a critical issue by ensuring that JSON decoding errors are handled, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the data being processed.	9
	Improve error handling for the pull request response to enhance robustness ___ **Consider adding error handling for cases where the doRequestGitHub function fails or returns an unexpected response format, to ensure robustness.** [Src/comments.php [499-501]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/475/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR499-R501) ```diff -if ($pullRequestResponse->statusCode !== 200) { +if ($pullRequestResponse->statusCode !== 200 || !isset($pullRequestResponse->body)) { + // Handle error appropriately, e.g., log the error or throw an exception return false; } ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion improves error handling by checking for both the status code and the presence of the response body, which enhances the robustness of the function.	8
Debugging	Log the status code when the pull request check fails for better debugging ___ **It may be beneficial to log the response status code for debugging purposes if the pull request is not open.** [Src/comments.php [499-501]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/475/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR499-R501) ```diff if ($pullRequestResponse->statusCode !== 200) { + error_log("Pull request check failed with status code: " . $pullRequestResponse->statusCode); return false; } ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Logging the status code can aid in debugging, but it is not as critical as the other suggestions that address potential failures in the code logic.	7
Maintainability	Rename the variable for clarity regarding its content ___ **Consider using a more descriptive variable name for $pullRequestResponse to clarify its purpose.** [Src/comments.php [498]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/475/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR498-R498) ```diff -$pullRequestResponse = doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], $metadata["pullRequestUrl"], null, "GET"); +$responseFromGitHub = doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], $metadata["pullRequestUrl"], null, "GET"); ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While renaming the variable improves code readability, it does not address a functional issue, making it a minor improvement.	5