guibranco / gstraccini-bot-service

πŸ€– :octocat: GStraccini-bot automates repository management, ensuring organization and health by handling pull requests, issues, comments, and commits.
https://gstraccini.bot
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Fix typo in comments.php for PullRequestNumber #480

Closed guibranco closed 1 month ago

guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description


Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Bug fix
comments.php
Fix typo in PullRequestNumber variable                                     

src/comments.php
  • Fixed a typo in the variable name for PullRequestNumber.
  • Updated the URL construction for copied issues.
  • +1/-1     
    deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Here's the code health analysis summary for commits eb9aa70..fc5aa39. View details on DeepSource β†—.

    Analysis Summary

    AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
    DeepSource Docker LogoDockerβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource PHP LogoPHPβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource Secrets LogoSecretsβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource SQL LogoSQLβœ… SuccessView Check β†—

    πŸ’‘ If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Review πŸ”

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 1, because the change is a simple typo fix with minimal impact on the codebase.
    πŸ§ͺ Relevant tests No
    ⚑ Possible issues No
    πŸ”’ Security concerns No
    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Correct the casing of the variable to prevent potential undefined variable errors ___ **Ensure that the variable PullRequestNumber is correctly spelled with consistent casing, as
    it was previously spelled as PulLRequestNumber, which could lead to undefined variable
    errors.** [Src/comments.php [323]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/480/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR323-R323) ```diff +$body = "Issue copied from [{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}](https://github.com/{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber})"; - ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: Correcting the casing of the variable `PullRequestNumber` is crucial to prevent potential undefined variable errors, which can lead to runtime issues.
    10
    Possible issue
    Add validation for the comment object properties to ensure they exist before usage ___ **Consider validating that the comment object contains the expected properties before using
    them to avoid runtime errors.** [Src/comments.php [323]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/480/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR323-R323) ```diff -$body = "Issue copied from [{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}](https://github.com/{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber})"; +if (isset($comment->RepositoryOwner, $comment->RepositoryName, $comment->PullRequestNumber)) { + $body = "Issue copied from [{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}](https://github.com/{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber})"; +} ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding validation for the properties of the `comment` object helps ensure that the code does not encounter runtime errors, improving robustness.
    8
    Maintainability
    Rename the variable to enhance code clarity and maintainability ___ **Use a more descriptive variable name for $body to improve code readability and
    maintainability.** [Src/comments.php [323]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/480/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR323-R323) ```diff -$body = "Issue copied from [{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}](https://github.com/{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber})"; +$issueCopyMessage = "Issue copied from [{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}](https://github.com/{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber})"; ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While renaming `$body` to a more descriptive name enhances readability, it is a minor improvement compared to addressing potential bugs.
    6
    Enhancement
    Introduce a constant for the GitHub URL to reduce redundancy and simplify future changes ___ **Consider using a constant for the GitHub URL to avoid repetition and make future updates
    easier.** [Src/comments.php [323]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/480/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR323-R323) ```diff -$body = "Issue copied from [{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}](https://github.com/{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber})"; +define('GITHUB_URL', 'https://github.com/'); +$body = "Issue copied from [{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}](GITHUB_URL{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber})"; ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Introducing a constant for the GitHub URL is a good practice for maintainability, but it is not critical to the functionality of the code.
    5
    github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    10:37PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    10:37PM INF 418 commits scanned.
    10:37PM INF scan completed in 119ms
    10:37PM INF no leaks found
    
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud