guibranco / gstraccini-bot-service

πŸ€– :octocat: GStraccini-bot automates repository management, ensuring organization and health by handling pull requests, issues, comments, and commits.
https://gstraccini.bot
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Enhance issue copy message formatting and links #497

Closed guibranco closed 1 month ago

guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description


Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Enhancement
comments.php
Enhance issue copy message formatting and links                   

src/comments.php
  • Improved formatting of issue copy messages.
  • Added source issue link for better traceability.
  • Updated variable names for clarity.
  • +8/-3     
    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Review πŸ”

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve string formatting and variable renaming.
    πŸ§ͺ Relevant tests No
    ⚑ Possible issues No
    πŸ”’ Security concerns No
    deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Here's the code health analysis summary for commits c1bb83d..f08a1dd. View details on DeepSource β†—.

    Analysis Summary

    AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
    DeepSource Docker LogoDockerβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource PHP LogoPHPβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource Secrets LogoSecretsβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource SQL LogoSQLβœ… SuccessView Check β†—

    πŸ’‘ If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
    github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    12:02PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    12:02PM INF 433 commits scanned.
    12:02PM INF scan completed in 121ms
    12:02PM INF no leaks found
    
    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add error handling for the API request to ensure robustness ___ **Ensure that the doRequestGitHub function handles potential errors from the API calls, such
    as checking the response status.** [Src/comments.php [326]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/497/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR326-R326) ```diff -doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], $metadata["commentUrl"], array("body" => $body), "POST"); +$response = doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], $metadata["commentUrl"], array("body" => $body), "POST"); +if ($response->status !== 200) { /* handle error */ } ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding error handling for API requests is crucial for robustness and reliability, making this a significant improvement to the code.
    8
    Add validation for the target and source variables to handle potential undefined properties ___ **Ensure that the $target and $source variables are properly validated to avoid potential
    issues with undefined properties or incorrect formatting.** [Src/comments.php [319-322]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/497/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR319-R322) ```diff -$target = "{$targetRepository}#{$number}"; -$source = "{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}#{$comment->PullRequestNumber}"; +$target = isset($number) ? "{$targetRepository}#{$number}" : "{$targetRepository}#unknown"; +$source = isset($comment->PullRequestNumber) ? "{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}#{$comment->PullRequestNumber}" : "{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}#unknown"; ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion addresses potential issues with undefined properties, which is important for robustness, but the proposed solution may be overly cautious since the properties are expected to be set.
    7
    Best practice
    Use URL encoding for constructing the source URL to prevent issues with special characters ___ **Consider using http_build_query for constructing URLs to ensure proper encoding of query
    parameters.** [Src/comments.php [323]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/497/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR323-R323) ```diff -$sourceUrl = "https://github.com/{$comment->RepositoryOwner}/{$comment->RepositoryName}/issues/{$comment->PullRequestNumber}"; +$sourceUrl = "https://github.com/" . urlencode($comment->RepositoryOwner) . "/" . urlencode($comment->RepositoryName) . "/issues/" . urlencode($comment->PullRequestNumber); ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While using URL encoding is a good practice, the suggestion does not account for the fact that the current implementation may already handle most cases correctly, making this a minor improvement.
    6
    Maintainability
    Refactor the duplicate API calls into a single function to enhance code maintainability ___ **Consider consolidating the two doRequestGitHub calls into a single function to reduce
    redundancy and improve maintainability.** [Src/comments.php [326-329]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/497/files#diff-c016a4b724b06cf94f3e5e764ca4f4eb4d42b550ddca3566f9b03c2f3bec51faR326-R329) ```diff -doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], $metadata["commentUrl"], array("body" => $body), "POST"); -doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], "repos/{$targetRepository}/issues/{$number}/comments", array("body" => $body), "POST"); +function postComment($token, $url, $body) { + return doRequestGitHub($token, $url, array("body" => $body), "POST"); +} +postComment($metadata["token"], $metadata["commentUrl"], $body); +postComment($metadata["token"], "repos/{$targetRepository}/issues/{$number}/comments", $body); ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While reducing redundancy is beneficial, the suggestion does not address the immediate functionality of the code and may complicate the implementation without substantial benefit.
    5
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud