Enhance error handling in github.php

[guibranco]

Description

• Enhanced error handling for invalid HTTP methods in the doRequestGitHub function.
• Introduced a clearer error message format when an invalid method is encountered.
• Modified the error logging condition to include a broader range of status codes.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Error handling	github.php Enhance error handling in GitHub request function                Src/lib/github.php Improved error handling for invalid HTTP methods. Added a new error message format for better clarity. Adjusted the condition for logging errors based on response status codes. +5/-2

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved error handling for invalid HTTP methods, providing clearer feedback with specific status codes and messages.
  • Enhanced criteria for capturing error states, allowing for more comprehensive error logging.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 50 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ebb3980bd5b4dc58bba1965b95d3684e3f515f8 and 99240adc17cd153d943d1e390ee7f9665aaf3e5f.

Walkthrough

The changes made in the doRequestGitHub function focus on enhancing error handling and response structure when an invalid HTTP method is encountered. Previously, the function logged an error message but did not modify the response object. The updated implementation now constructs a new error message and initializes a stdClass object for the response, setting the statusCode to -2 and including the error message in the result object. This adjustment provides a clearer definition of the error response.

Furthermore, the condition for checking error status codes has been revised. The previous check assessed if the statusCode was -1 or greater than or equal to 300. The new condition broadens this check to include any statusCode that is less than or equal to 0 or greater than or equal to 300. This change allows for a more comprehensive capture of various error states.

Overall, these modifications enhance the function's robustness in handling errors, ensuring that invalid method usage is met with a well-defined response.

Changes

File	Change Summary
Src/lib/github.php	Modified error handling in doRequestGitHub to improve response structure and clarity. Updated condition for checking error status codes.

Poem

🐇 In the code where errors play,
A new response lights the way.
With clearer paths and messages bright,
Invalid methods now take flight.
Robust and strong, our code will be,
A joyful hop, as smooth as can be! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily focus on error handling improvements without introducing complex logic.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[deepsource-io[bot]]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits ba5859e..99240ad. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success	🎯 4 occurences resolved	View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Correct the instantiation of the standard class ___ **Instead of using new stdCLass(), consider using new stdClass() to ensure proper class instantiation.** [Src/lib/github.php [54]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/517/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R54-R54) ```diff -$response = new stdCLass(); +$response = new stdClass(); ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a typo in the class instantiation, which could lead to runtime errors.	8
	Use strict comparison for status code checks to improve error handling accuracy ___ **Modify the status code check to use strict comparison for better accuracy in error handling.** [Src/lib/github.php [60]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/517/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R60-R60) ```diff -if ($response->statusCode <= 0 || $response->statusCode >= 300) { +if ($response->statusCode < 0 || $response->statusCode >= 300) { ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion improves the accuracy of error handling by recommending strict comparison, which is a best practice.	8
Possible issue	Initialize the result variable to prevent undefined variable issues ___ **Ensure that $result is initialized before assigning $result->error, to avoid potential undefined variable errors.** [Src/lib/github.php [56]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/517/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R56-R56) ```diff +if (!isset($result)) { $result = new stdClass(); } $result->error = $message; ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion addresses a potential issue with undefined variables, which is important for code stability.	7
Enhancement	Enhance error logging by including additional context information ___ **Consider logging the URL and method in the new error handling to maintain consistency with the previous error logging.** [Src/lib/github.php [62]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/517/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R62-R62) ```diff -$logger->log("Error on GitHub request", $info); +$logger->log("Error on GitHub request", array("info" => $info, "url" => $url, "method" => $method)); ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While this suggestion improves logging consistency, it is more of a minor enhancement rather than a critical fix.	6

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

1:09AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
1:09AM INF 453 commits scanned.
1:09AM INF scan completed in 123ms
1:09AM INF no leaks found