Enhance error handling in GitHub request function

guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description

Enhanced the doRequestGitHub function to handle 404 status codes specifically for non-GET requests.
Improved logging for errors on GitHub requests.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Error handling

github.php

Improve error handling in GitHub request function

Src/lib/github.php

Enhanced error handling for GitHub requests.

Added specific condition for 404 status code with non-GET methods.

+1/-1

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes
- Improved error handling for 404 responses based on the HTTP method used, allowing GET requests to be processed more effectively even when a 404 status is returned.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the doRequestGitHub function in Src/lib/github.php by refining the error handling logic. It adds a specific condition for treating 404 status codes differently based on the HTTP method used, allowing GET requests to be valid even if they return a 404 status. This change enhances the function's ability to manage various HTTP responses more effectively.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`Src/lib/github.php`	Updated conditional logic in `doRequestGitHub` to handle `404` status codes differently based on HTTP method.

Possibly related PRs

#507: Modifies error handling logic in the doRequestGitHub function, directly related to this PR.
#515: Fixes parameter order in the doRequestGitHub function, relevant to the same function.
#516: Enhances error handling in the doRequestGitHub function, aligning with the focus of this PR.
#517: Further enhances error handling in the doRequestGitHub function, making it relevant to the changes in this PR.

Suggested labels

enhancement, size/XS, Review effort [1-5]: 2

Poem

🐇 In the code where bunnies hop,
A change was made, we won’t stop.
A 404 now finds its place,
With GET requests, it’s a friendly face.
Error handling, oh so bright,
Hopping forward, coding right! 🐇

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 7fd5a6f..b4a1ee0. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Link
Docker	✅ Success	View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success	View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success	View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success	View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and involve a specific condition for error handling without introducing significant complexity.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

10:07PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:07PM INF 458 commits scanned.
10:07PM INF scan completed in 130ms
10:07PM INF no leaks found

penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Change the error handling to throw an exception for better error management ___ It may be beneficial to throw an exception or return an error response instead of just logging the error, to allow upstream handling of the error. [Src/lib/github.php [61]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/524/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R61-R61) ```diff -$logger->log("Error on GitHub request", $info); +throw new Exception("Error on GitHub request: {$info}"); ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses a significant improvement in error handling by proposing to throw an exception, which allows for better management of errors upstream, making it a crucial enhancement.	9
Enhancement	Enhance the error log message to include status code and method for better clarity ___ Consider using a more descriptive error message that includes the status code and method for better debugging. [Src/lib/github.php [61]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/524/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R61-R61) ```diff -$logger->log("Error on GitHub request", $info); +$logger->log("Error on GitHub request: Status Code {$response->statusCode}, Method: {$method}", $info); ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion enhances the clarity of error logs, which is beneficial for debugging and understanding the context of errors, making it a valuable improvement.	8
Maintainability	Add a check to ensure the logger is defined before logging errors ___ Ensure that the `$logger` is defined and accessible in the scope where the logging occurs to prevent potential undefined variable errors. [Src/lib/github.php [61]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/524/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R61-R61) ```diff -$logger->log("Error on GitHub request", $info); +if (isset($logger)) { $logger->log("Error on GitHub request", $info); } ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion is valid as it addresses the potential for an undefined variable error, which is important for maintainability, but it may not be a critical issue if the logger is guaranteed to be defined.	7
Possible issue	Improve error handling by refining the condition for 404 status code ___ Consider adding a specific handling case for the 404 status code when the method is "GET" to provide more granular error handling. [Src/lib/github.php [59]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/524/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R59-R59) ```diff -if (($response->statusCode === 404 && $method !== "GET") \|\| $response->statusCode <= 0 \|\| $response->statusCode >= 300) { +if (($response->statusCode === 404 && $method !== "GET") \|\| ($response->statusCode <= 0 \|\| $response->statusCode >= 300)) { ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: The suggestion points out a potential improvement in error handling for 404 status codes, but the current implementation already checks for this case, albeit in a combined condition.	5