guibranco / gstraccini-bot-service

πŸ€– :octocat: GStraccini-bot automates repository management, ensuring organization and health by handling pull requests, issues, comments, and commits.
https://gstraccini.bot
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Update warning and tip notations in README.md #546

Closed guibranco closed 1 month ago

guibranco commented 1 month ago

Description


Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Documentation
README.md
Update warning and tip notations in README                             

README.md
  • Changed warning notation from !Warning to !NOTE.
  • Updated !Important to !TIP.
  • +2/-2     

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    deepsource-io[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Here's the code health analysis summary for commits b84fa34..82b5d46. View details on DeepSource β†—.

    Analysis Summary

    AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
    DeepSource Docker LogoDockerβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource PHP LogoPHPβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource Secrets LogoSecretsβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
    DeepSource SQL LogoSQLβœ… SuccessView Check β†—

    πŸ’‘ If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
    coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Walkthrough

    The changes involve updates to the README.md file, specifically modifying warning and tip annotations to enhance clarity and consistency. The [!Warning] annotation has been replaced with [!NOTE], shifting from a cautionary tone to a more neutral informational tone. Additionally, [!Important] has been changed to [!TIP], suggesting a more supportive context. These alterations aim to improve user understanding of the bot's functionalities, particularly related to feedback mechanisms and item selection features.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    README.md Renamed [!Warning] to [!NOTE] and [!Important] to [!TIP] for improved clarity and consistency.

    Poem

    In the meadow where rabbits play,
    Notes and tips brighten the day.
    With clearer words, we hop along,
    Sharing wisdom in a joyful song.
    So let’s embrace this change with cheer,
    For understanding grows when we are near! πŸ‡βœ¨


    Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**
    Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b84fa34ccc0d7bd970f06d1ac424877ac0b69535 and 82b5d469a46cc9e2857f6afe2e61a2c00008423b.
    Files selected for processing (1) * README.md (1 hunks)
    Additional context used
    Markdownlint
    README.md
    47-47: null Blank line inside blockquote (MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)
    Additional comments not posted (2)
    README.md (2)
    `44-44`: **LGTM!** The change from `[!Warning]` to `[!NOTE]` is appropriate and helps improve clarity in communication by using a more neutral informational tone. --- `48-48`: **LGTM!** The change from `[!Important]` to `[!TIP]` is appropriate and helps improve clarity in communication by using a more supportive and helpful tone.
    --- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Review πŸ”

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 1, because the changes are straightforward and involve only minor text updates in the documentation.
    πŸ§ͺ Relevant tests No
    ⚑ Possible issues No
    πŸ”’ Security concerns No
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud

    penify-dev[bot] commented 1 month ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Maintainability
    Standardize the notation for tips to match the previous important messages for consistency ___ **The use of 'NOTE' and 'TIP' should be standardized to match the previous 'Warning' and
    'Important' notations for better readability.** [README.md [48-50]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/546/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R48-R50) ```diff -> [!TIP] +> [!IMPORTANT] > > You can tick (βœ…) one item from the above list, and it will be triggered! (In beta). ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion highlights the need for standardization in notation, which enhances readability and maintains a uniform style, making it a valuable improvement.
    8
    Ensure consistent notation for warning and tip sections for better clarity ___ **Consider using consistent notation for the warning and tip sections to improve clarity and
    maintain a uniform style throughout the document.** [README.md [44-46]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/546/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R44-R46) ```diff -> [!NOTE] +> [!TIP] > > If you aren't allowed to use this bot, a reaction with a thumbs down will be added to your comment. ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion addresses consistency in notation, which is important for clarity, but it does not propose a change that significantly impacts functionality or user understanding.
    7
    Enhancement
    Add context to the note to improve user understanding of the bot's usage restrictions ___ **Consider providing additional context or examples for the new notations to enhance user
    understanding.** [README.md [44-46]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/546/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R44-R46) ```diff > [!NOTE] > -> If you aren't allowed to use this bot, a reaction with a thumbs down will be added to your comment. +> If you aren't allowed to use this bot, a reaction with a thumbs down will be added to your comment. Please contact your administrator for access. ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While adding context can improve user understanding, the suggestion does not directly address the changes made in the PR and is more of a general enhancement.
    6
    Best practice
    Ensure the formatting of the new notations is compatible with various markdown viewers ___ **Review the formatting of the new notations to ensure they are rendered correctly across
    different markdown viewers.** [README.md [48-50]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/546/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R48-R50) ```diff > [!TIP] > -> You can tick (βœ…) one item from the above list, and it will be triggered! (In beta). +> You can tick (βœ…) one item from the above list, and it will be triggered! (In beta). Ensure you are aware of the current limitations. ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: The suggestion is valid but lacks specificity regarding the actual changes made in the PR, making it less impactful in terms of immediate relevance.
    5
    github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    12:56AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    12:56AM INF 473 commits scanned.
    12:56AM INF scan completed in 126ms
    12:56AM INF no leaks found