Enhance README.md with improved structure and additional links

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• [ ] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• [ ] My code requires changes to the documentation
• [ ] I have updated the documentation as required
• [ ] All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• [ ] Yes
• [ ] No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Improved the structure of the README.md by changing section headers for better readability.
• Introduced a new 'Links' section that provides direct access to the GitHub Marketplace, GitHub App, and the repository.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Documentation	README.md Update section headers and add useful links in README        README.md Changed section headers from '###' to '##' for better hierarchy. Added a new section titled 'Links' with relevant URLs. +12/-2

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Introduced a "Links" section in the README for easy access to important resources related to the GStraccini bot.
• Documentation
  • Restructured section headers for improved organization and readability in the README.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the README.md file, focusing on the enhancement of document structure and the inclusion of a new section for links. The section headers for "Webhooks" and "Cronjobs" have been elevated to a higher-level heading, improving organization. Additionally, a new "Links" section has been added, providing direct access to important resources related to the GStraccini bot.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Restructured section headers for "Webhooks" and "Cronjobs" to higher-level headings; added a new "Links" section with relevant URLs.

Possibly related PRs

• 546: The changes in this PR also involve modifications to the README.md file, specifically enhancing clarity and organization, which is directly related to the restructuring of section headers and the addition of a new section in the main PR.

Suggested labels

Review effort [1-5]: 1

Poem

🐰 In the README, oh so bright,
Links now shine, a joyful sight!
Webhooks and Cronjobs stand tall,
Organized, clear for all!
Hop along, dear users, see,
The GStraccini bot's the key! 🌟

---

Recent review details

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82a8cb0190c1f04e5fff355739821061cd22667b and cd5470684d80f899aa9ea4bd473c34cecc6e2cc2.

Files selected for processing (1)

* README.md (2 hunks)

Additional context used

LanguageTool

README.md

[style] ~65-~65: This expression usually appears with a “please” in front of it. Context: ...re interested in hosting your instance, let me know, and I will share the database schemas ... (INSERT_PLEASE)

Additional comments not posted (3)

README.md (3)

`61-61`: **LGTM!** Elevating the "Webhooks" section header level improves the document structure and readability. --- `69-69`: **LGTM!** Elevating the "Cronjobs" section header level improves the document structure and readability. --- `83-88`: **Great addition!** The new "Links" section provides quick access to relevant resources. The links are correctly formatted and point to the intended destinations.

--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[deepsource-io[bot]]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 82a8cb0..cd54706. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve formatting and adding links in the documentation.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Enhancement	Add descriptions for each cronjob to clarify their purpose for users ___ **Consider adding a brief explanation of what each cronjob does to provide clarity for users unfamiliar with the bot's functionality.** [README.md [77-79]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/558/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R77-R79) ```diff --  - 🕐 every 1 minute +-  - 🕐 every 1 minute (Handles push events) ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding descriptions for cronjobs significantly enhances user understanding of the bot's functionality, addressing a potential knowledge gap.	8
	Add a brief description for the "Links" section to provide context for users ___ **It would be beneficial to provide a brief description or context for the "Links" section to guide users on what they can find there.** [README.md [83]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/558/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R83-R83) ```diff ## Links +Here are some useful resources related to the GStraccini bot: ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding context for the "Links" section would enhance user understanding, making it a valuable improvement.	7
Maintainability	Change the heading level for the "Webhooks" section to enhance document structure ___ **Consider using a more descriptive heading level for the "Webhooks" and "Cronjobs" sections to improve the document's structure and readability.** [README.md [61]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/558/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R61-R61) ```diff -## Webhooks +### Webhooks ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While changing the heading level can improve structure, the current level is not incorrect, and this is a minor enhancement.	6
Possible issue	Verify the functionality of the links in the "Links" section to ensure they direct users to the correct resources ___ **Ensure that the links in the "Links" section are functional and lead to the correct resources, as broken links can frustrate users.** [README.md [85-88]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/558/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R85-R88) ```diff -- [GitHub Marketplace](https://github.com/marketplace/gstraccini-bot) +- [GitHub Marketplace](https://github.com/marketplace/gstraccini-bot) # Verify this link ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While verifying links is important, the suggestion does not provide a direct improvement to the code itself, making it less impactful.	5

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

```txt 1:46AM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 1:46AM INF 481 commits scanned. 1:46AM INF scan completed in 126ms 1:46AM INF no leaks found ```