Closed guibranco closed 3 weeks ago
[!WARNING]
Rate limit exceeded
@github-actions[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review.
How to resolve this issue?
After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.How do rate limits work?
CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.Commits
Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73f66bca03b1c3448cc4d7d853a8f47f0fc5be7c and 55076b368d236cbd902f59207a964bbeef433231.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
β±οΈ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 2, because the changes are primarily documentation updates, which are generally straightforward to review. |
π§ͺ Relevant tests | No |
β‘ Possible issues | No |
π Security concerns | No |
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 73f66bc..55076b3
. View details on DeepSource β.
Analyzer | Status | Summary | Link |
---|---|---|---|
Docker | β Success | View Check β | |
PHP | β Success | View Check β | |
Secrets | β Success | View Check β | |
SQL | β Success | View Check β |
π‘ If youβre a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
Category | Suggestion | Score |
Enhancement |
Provide context for the cronjob section to enhance user understanding___ **Consider adding a brief explanation of the cronjob functionality to provide users withcontext on its importance and operation.** [README.md [74]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/560/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R74-R74) ```diff +## Cronjobs ++GStraccini-bot runs automated tasks at regular intervals to ensure continuous operation and maintenance of your repository. ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8Why: This suggestion enhances user understanding by providing context for the cronjob section, which is important for users to grasp the functionality of the bot. | 8 |
Maintainability |
Improve the consistency of command descriptions for better readability___ **Consider rephrasing the command descriptions to maintain a consistent tone and stylethroughout the document, ensuring clarity and professionalism.** [README.md [39-41]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/560/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R39-R41) ```diff -+- `@gstraccini hello`: Greets the invoker. -+- `@gstraccini thank you`: Replies with a "You're welcome" message. ++- `@gstraccini hello`: Sends a greeting to the invoker. ++- `@gstraccini thank you`: Responds with a "You're welcome" message. ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7Why: The suggestion improves the clarity and professionalism of the command descriptions, which is important for user understanding, but it addresses a minor stylistic issue rather than a critical one. | 7 |
Standardize section titles for better document structure___ **The section titles could be formatted consistently (e.g., using the same heading level) toimprove the overall structure and readability of the document.** [README.md [12-20]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/560/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R12-R20) ```diff -+## About the Bot -+## About This Repository ++### About the Bot ++### About This Repository ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5Why: While standardizing section titles can improve readability, the current format is still functional, making this a minor enhancement rather than a critical change. | 5 | |
Clarity |
Simplify the note regarding bot usage for improved clarity___ **The note about command usage could be made more concise to enhance readability andclarity.** [README.md [58]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/560/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R58-R58) ```diff -+> **Note**: If you are not allowed to use the bot, a thumbs-down reaction will be added to your comment. ++> **Note**: A thumbs-down reaction will be added to your comment if you are not permitted to use the bot. ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6Why: The suggestion simplifies the note, making it clearer, but the original note was already understandable, so the improvement is moderate. | 6 |
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked!
I'm sorry @penify-dev[bot], I can't do that. You aren't a collaborator in this repository. :pleading_face:
User description
Closes #
π Description
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
βΉ Additional Information
Description
GStraccini-bot
to clarify its purpose and functionality.Changes walkthrough π
README.md
Improve README.md Clarity and Formatting
README.md
GStraccini-bot
for clarity.