search

guibranco / gstraccini-bot-service

🤖 :octocat: GStraccini-bot automates repository management, ensuring organization and health by handling pull requests, issues, comments, and commits.
https://gstraccini.bot
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Improve Prettier logging in workflow configuration #567

Closed guibranco closed 3 weeks ago

guibranco commented 3 weeks ago

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
prettier.yml
Improve logging for Prettier format check                               
.github/workflows/prettier.yml
  • Changed the way the Prettier format check output is logged.
  • Updated the command to append output directly to the log file.
    		•  +2/-1     

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Walkthrough

    The changes involve an update to the command in the .github/workflows/prettier.yml file that runs the Prettier format check. The command now directly appends the output of npm run format:check to prettier.log, eliminating the previous use of echo. Additionally, a blank line has been added to enhance readability in the workflow file.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    .github/workflows/prettier.yml Modified command to append output of npm run format:check directly to prettier.log, removing the use of echo. Added a blank line for readability.

    Sequence Diagram(s)

    sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Prettier
    participant Log

    User->>Prettier: Run format check
    Prettier->>Log: Append output to prettier.log

    Poem

    In the garden of code, so neat and bright,
    A change was made, oh what a sight!
    With Prettier's grace, the logs now flow,
    Simplified commands make clarity grow.
    Hoppy days ahead, with each little tweak,
    A smoother path for all who seek! 🐇✨

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    deepsource-io[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 2d9ef20..008a0ba. View details on DeepSource ↗.

    Analysis Summary

    AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
    DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    DeepSource PHP LogoPHP✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    DeepSource SQL LogoSQL✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
    penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve logging adjustments with minimal complexity.
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    ⚡ Possible issues No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Add error handling to ensure the workflow fails if the format check does not pass ___ **It may be beneficial to add error handling after the format check to ensure the workflow
    fails if the check fails.** [.github/workflows/prettier.yml [67]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/567/files#diff-f4594992f4599bbb2b28080456c07ec027f0c29b2e5d34c0ef0c8bac6f539b9bR67-R67) ```diff -npm run format:check >> prettier.log +npm run format:check >> prettier.log || exit 1 ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding error handling is important to ensure the workflow fails appropriately if the format check does not pass, which is a significant improvement.
    		9
    Possible issue
    Remove output redirection to ensure errors are visible during the format check ___ **Consider using npm run format:check without redirecting output to a log file, as it may
    mask errors during the check.** [.github/workflows/prettier.yml [67]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/567/files#diff-f4594992f4599bbb2b28080456c07ec027f0c29b2e5d34c0ef0c8bac6f539b9bR67-R67) ```diff -npm run format:check >> prettier.log +npm run format:check ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Removing the output redirection will ensure that any errors during the format check are visible, which is crucial for debugging.
    		8
    Enhancement
    Add a step to display the log contents after the format check for better visibility during debugging ___ **Consider adding a step to display the contents of prettier.log after the format check for
    easier debugging.** [.github/workflows/prettier.yml [67]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/567/files#diff-f4594992f4599bbb2b28080456c07ec027f0c29b2e5d34c0ef0c8bac6f539b9bR67-R67) ```diff -npm run format:check >> prettier.log +npm run format:check >> prettier.log && cat prettier.log ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: Displaying the log contents can aid in debugging, but it is a less critical enhancement compared to ensuring error visibility and handling.
    		4
    Maintainability
    Clear the log file before appending new output to prevent old logs from mixing with new logs ___ **Ensure that the log file is created or cleared before appending to it, to avoid appending
    to an old log.** [.github/workflows/prettier.yml [67]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/567/files#diff-f4594992f4599bbb2b28080456c07ec027f0c29b2e5d34c0ef0c8bac6f539b9bR67-R67) ```diff -npm run format:check >> prettier.log +> prettier.log; npm run format:check >> prettier.log ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 Why: While clearing the log file before appending can prevent confusion, it is a minor issue compared to ensuring errors are visible during the check.
    		3
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud

    github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

    💻 Scan logs ```txt 11:19PM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 11:19PM INF 490 commits scanned. 11:19PM INF scan completed in 128ms 11:19PM INF no leaks found ```