Enhance Codacy integration and add automatic commit message generation

guibranco commented 2 weeks ago

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

[ ] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
[ ] My code requires changes to the documentation
[ ] I have updated the documentation as required
[ ] All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

[ ] Yes
[ ] No

ℹ Additional Information

Description

Introduced a new functionality to bypass Codacy analysis for pull requests.
Added a command to the bot for bypassing Codacy checks.
Updated deployment workflow to include Codacy secrets generation.
Improved code formatting and added documentation for new functions.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

comments.php `Enhance Codacy integration with bypass functionality` Src/comments.php Added a new function `execute_codacyBypass` to bypass Codacy analysis. Improved code formatting for better readability.	+19/-7
codacy.php `Implement Codacy API interaction for bypassing analysis` Src/lib/codacy.php Introduced `bypassPullRequestAnalysis` function for Codacy API interaction. Added detailed documentation for the new function.	+48/-0
commands.json `Update command configuration for Codacy bypass` Src/config/commands.json Added a new command for bypassing Codacy analysis. Updated command descriptions for clarity.	+5/-0
deploy.yml `Update deployment workflow for Codacy secrets` .github/workflows/deploy.yml - Added steps to generate Codacy secrets file during deployment.	+8/-1
prepare-commit-msg `Add Git hook for automatic commit message generation` .githooks/prepare-commit-msg - Created a Git hook to generate commit messages automatically.	+10/-0

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Introduced a command to bypass Codacy analysis for pull requests.
- Added a new function to handle bypassing Codacy analysis.
- New GitHub Actions step for generating Codacy secrets file.
Bug Fixes
- Updated status reporting for check runs from "completed" to "succeeded" for pull requests and pushes.
Documentation
- Enhanced documentation for functions in the GitHub integration.
Chores
- Updated dependency version constraints for broader compatibility.
- Added "codacy" to spell checker configuration.
- Introduced a new script for commit message generation in Git hooks.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple files, including a new Git hook for preparing commit messages, updates to the GitHub Actions workflow for generating Codacy secrets, and the addition of functions to bypass Codacy analysis for pull requests. Changes also include updates to dependency version constraints and improvements in function documentation and signatures. Overall, the modifications aim to streamline processes related to commit management, secret handling, and logging functionalities.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`.githooks/prepare-commit-msg`	New shell script added to prepare commit messages using `dotnet-aicommitmessage` and handle empty messages.
`.github/workflows/deploy.yml`	Added a job to generate a Codacy secrets file and removed conditions for creating RabbitMQ secrets.
`.vscode/settings.json`	Added "codacy" to the spell checker configuration.
`Src/comments.php`	Introduced `execute_codacyBypass` function for bypassing Codacy analysis, with formatting improvements in `handleItem`.
`Src/composer.json`	Updated version constraint for `guibranco/pancake` package from `"^0.8.19"` to `"guibranco/pancake": ">=0.8.19"`.
`Src/config/commands.json`	Added new command `"codacy bypass"` to bypass Codacy analysis for pull requests.
`Src/config/config.php`	Included conditional requirement for `codacy.secrets.php` and instantiated a logger object.
`Src/lib/appveyor.php`	Removed instantiation of a new `Logger` instance in `requestAppVeyor` function.
`Src/lib/codacy.php`	Added `bypassPullRequestAnalysis` function to send a POST request to Codacy API for bypassing analysis.
`Src/lib/github.php`	Enhanced documentation and updated signatures for several functions to enforce type safety.
`Src/lib/queue.php`	Removed unused import statements.
`Src/pullRequests.php`	Updated `handleItem` to call `setCheckRunSucceeded` instead of `setCheckRunCompleted`.
`Src/pushes.php`	Modified `handleItem` to call `setCheckRunSucceeded` instead of `setCheckRunCompleted`.

Possibly related PRs

#570: Enhance RabbitMQ Secrets Management in deploy.yml: This PR modifies the deploy.yml file, which is relevant to the main PR's changes in the .githooks/prepare-commit-msg file as both involve aspects of managing workflows and scripts within the repository.

Suggested labels

➕ new command, :octocat: github-actions, 🛠️ workflow, ♻️ code quality

Suggested reviewers

gstraccini
gstraccini

🐰 In the meadow where the bunnies play,
New hooks and secrets brighten the day.
With Codacy bypass, we hop with glee,
In our code garden, oh so free!
Let the commits flow, let the changes ring,
For every little tweak, the rabbits sing! 🎶

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

deepsource-io[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 51c3bae..6dca507. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success	🎯 5 occurences resolved	View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success		View Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

penify-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the PR introduces new functionality, modifies multiple files, and includes significant changes to the codebase, including new functions and integration with Codacy.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Possible Bug: The new function `execute_codacyBypass` does not handle potential errors from the Codacy API, which could lead to unhandled exceptions.
⚡ Possible issues	Code Quality: The new function `bypassPullRequestAnalysis` lacks error handling for the API request, which could result in silent failures.
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Error handling	Improve error handling by replacing `die()` with exception throwing ___ Replace the usage of `die()` with a more graceful error handling mechanism, such as throwing an exception or logging the error, to prevent abrupt termination of the script. [Src/lib/github.php [142]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R142-R142) ```diff -die("Invalid GitHub response.\n" . json_encode($response)); +throw new Exception("Invalid GitHub response: " . json_encode($response)); ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses a significant issue with error handling by replacing `die()` with exception throwing, which improves the robustness of the code.	9
Best practice	Set default value for the `permissions` parameter to an empty array ___ Ensure that the `permissions` parameter in the `generateInstallationToken` function has a default value of an empty array instead of `null` to avoid potential type errors when accessing it. [Src/lib/github.php [128]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R128-R128) ```diff -function generateInstallationToken(string $installationId, string $repositoryName, array $permissions = null): string +function generateInstallationToken(string $installationId, string $repositoryName, array $permissions = []): string ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Setting a default value for the `permissions` parameter to an empty array is a good practice that prevents potential type errors, enhancing code reliability.	8
Maintainability	Replace global variable usage with function parameters for better maintainability ___ Avoid using global variables as they can lead to unexpected behavior and make the code harder to maintain. Consider passing `$appVeyorKey` and `$logger` as parameters to the `requestAppVeyor` function instead. [Src/lib/appveyor.php [7]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-5fce1078e9d444b9e1fba4d604da8c5cce4bea99ec46630f01297d8997ceb301R7-R7) ```diff -global $appVeyorKey, $logger; +// Pass $appVeyorKey and $logger as parameters to the function ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using global variables can lead to unexpected side effects and makes the code harder to test and maintain. Passing them as parameters would improve the function's reliability and clarity.	8
Maintainability	Refactor to avoid using global variables by passing dependencies as parameters ___ Instead of using a global variable for `$logger`, consider passing it as a parameter to functions that require logging to improve code maintainability and testability. [Src/lib/github.php [32]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R32-R32) ```diff -global $logger; +// Remove global declaration and pass $logger as a parameter to functions ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Refactoring to avoid global variables enhances maintainability and testability, but this change is less critical compared to the other suggestions.	6
Possible bug	Add validation for the response object to prevent accessing undefined properties ___ Consider validating the response from the GitHub API before attempting to access properties like `statusCode` and `body` to avoid potential runtime errors. [Src/lib/github.php [141]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R141-R141) ```diff -if ($response->statusCode >= 300) { +if (isset($response->statusCode) && $response->statusCode >= 300) { ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion improves code safety by ensuring that properties are checked for existence before access, which can prevent runtime errors.	7
Possible issue	Add error handling for the `setCheckRunSucceeded` function to prevent silent failures ___ Ensure that the function `setCheckRunSucceeded` is properly handling any potential errors or exceptions that may arise during its execution to avoid silent failures. [Src/pullRequests.php [139]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-a02ee044998cfd579cf9d812f74b51f079e912308e6ce6d9c1337620894ec463R139-R139) ```diff -setCheckRunSucceeded($metadata, $checkRunId, "pull request"); +if (!setCheckRunSucceeded($metadata, $checkRunId, "pull request")) { + // Handle error appropriately +} ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding error handling is important to prevent silent failures, but the suggestion does not address the actual implementation of error handling in the context of the existing code.	7
Possible issue	Implement error handling for the `setCheckRunSucceeded` function to enhance reliability ___ Similar to the previous suggestion, ensure that the `setCheckRunSucceeded` function call is wrapped in error handling to manage any potential issues that could occur during its execution. [Src/pushes.php [27]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-e0a3e86e3809e8eaeff850c08db6b4b30cfb2e98a4f09fb4c87b2b5d7aec66bcR27-R27) ```diff -setCheckRunSucceeded($metadata, $checkRunId, "commit"); +if (!setCheckRunSucceeded($metadata, $checkRunId, "commit")) { + // Handle error appropriately +} ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion is valid as it emphasizes error handling, which is crucial for robustness, but it lacks specificity about how to implement the error handling effectively.	7
Security	Validate secrets before writing them to files to enhance security ___ Ensure that the secrets being echoed into `codacy.secrets.php` are properly validated to prevent potential security risks from invalid or malicious input. [.github/workflows/deploy.yml [70]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/576/files#diff-28802fbf11c83a2eee09623fb192785e7ca92a3f40602a517c011b947a1822d3R70-R70) ```diff +# Validate the secret before echoing it echo "\$codacyApiToken = \"${{ secrets.CODACY_API_TOKEN }}\";" >> codacy.secrets.php ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While validating secrets is a good practice for security, the suggestion does not provide a clear method for validation, making it less actionable.	6