search

guibranco / gstraccini-bot-service

🤖 :octocat: GStraccini-bot automates repository management, ensuring organization and health by handling pull requests, issues, comments, and commits.
https://gstraccini.bot
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

Enhance pull request management by removing labels on closure #579

Closed guibranco closed 2 weeks ago

guibranco commented 2 weeks ago

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

ℹ Additional Information

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
pullRequests.php
Enhance pull request handling by removing labels                 
src/pullRequests.php
  • Added a new function removeLabels to handle label removal from closed
    pull requests.
  • Integrated removeLabels function into the existing workflow when a
    pull request is closed.
  • Defined a set of labels to be removed upon closing a pull request.
    		•  +19/-0   

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

    [!CAUTION]

    Review failed

    The pull request is closed.

    Walkthrough

    The changes introduce a new function, removeLabels, in the Src/pullRequests.php file. This function is invoked when a pull request is closed and is responsible for removing specific labels, namely "🚦 awaiting triage," "⏳ awaiting response," and "🛠 WIP." It constructs DELETE requests to the GitHub API to remove these labels and modifies the control flow of the handleItem function to incorporate this new functionality.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    Src/pullRequests.php Added function removeLabels($metadata, $pullRequest) to remove specific labels from closed PRs.

    Possibly related PRs

    Suggested labels

    size/XS, Review effort [1-5]: 2

    🐇 In the meadow, labels fall,
    Closed PRs, we heed the call.
    With a gentle swipe, they disappear,
    Triage awaits, no need to fear!
    A tidy space, our work is done,
    Hopping forward, we’ve just begun! 🌼

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    deepsource-io[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

    Here's the code health analysis summary for commits ca98cf8..387d05b. View details on DeepSource ↗.

    Analysis Summary

    AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
    DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    DeepSource PHP LogoPHP✅ Success
    🎯 1 occurence resolved
    		View Check ↗
    DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    DeepSource SQL LogoSQL✅ SuccessView Check ↗
    💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 3, because the new function `removeLabels` adds complexity to the pull request handling logic, and it requires understanding of the existing codebase to ensure proper integration.
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    ⚡ Possible issues Possible Bug: The `removeLabels` function assumes that the `labels` property of `$pullRequest` is always an array. If it is not, this could lead to errors.
    🔒 Security concerns No
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    1 New issue
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud

    github-actions[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

    Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

    💻 Scan logs ```txt 2:08AM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 2:08AM INF 501 commits scanned. 2:08AM INF scan completed in 131ms 2:08AM INF no leaks found ```
    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible bug
    Add a check for the existence of the labels property on the pull request object ___ **Ensure that the removeLabels function checks if the labels property exists on the
    $pullRequest object before attempting to access it to avoid potential errors.** [Src/pullRequests.php [151]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/579/files#diff-a02ee044998cfd579cf9d812f74b51f079e912308e6ce6d9c1337620894ec463R151-R151) ```diff -$labels = array_column($pullRequest->labels, "name"); +$labels = isset($pullRequest->labels) ? array_column($pullRequest->labels, "name") : []; ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion addresses a potential bug by ensuring that the code does not attempt to access a property that may not exist, which could lead to runtime errors.
    		9
    Possible issue
    Implement error handling for the API request in the removeLabels function ___ **Consider handling the case where the doRequestGitHub function fails, to ensure that errors
    are logged or managed appropriately.** [Src/pullRequests.php [157]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/579/files#diff-a02ee044998cfd579cf9d812f74b51f079e912308e6ce6d9c1337620894ec463R157-R157) ```diff -doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], $url, null, "DELETE"); +$response = doRequestGitHub($metadata["token"], $url, null, "DELETE"); +if ($response === false) { /* handle error */ } ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion improves the robustness of the code by adding error handling for API requests, which is crucial for maintaining application stability.
    		8
    Maintainability
    Add logging for the labels being removed in the removeLabels function ___ **It may be beneficial to log the labels that are being removed for better traceability and
    debugging.** [Src/pullRequests.php [155]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/579/files#diff-a02ee044998cfd579cf9d812f74b51f079e912308e6ce6d9c1337620894ec463R155-R155) ```diff -$label = str_replace(" ", "%20", $label); +error_log("Removing label: " . $label); $label = str_replace(" ", "%20", $label); ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding logging for removed labels enhances maintainability and debugging capabilities, although it is not critical for functionality.
    		7
    Best practice
    Refactor the hardcoded labels into a constant for better maintainability ___ **Consider using a constant or configuration for the labels in $labelsLookup to avoid
    hardcoding and improve maintainability.** [Src/pullRequests.php [145-149]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/579/files#diff-a02ee044998cfd579cf9d812f74b51f079e912308e6ce6d9c1337620894ec463R145-R149) ```diff -$labelsLookup = [ - "🚦 awaiting triage", - "⏳ awaiting response", - "🛠 WIP" -]; +const LABELS_LOOKUP = [ "🚦 awaiting triage", "⏳ awaiting response", "🛠 WIP" ]; $labelsLookup = LABELS_LOOKUP; ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Refactoring hardcoded values into constants is a good practice for maintainability, but it does not address an immediate issue in the code.
    		6