Refactor request handling and update commit message generation

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• [x] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• [x] My code requires changes to the documentation
• [x] I have updated the documentation as required
• [x] All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• [x] Yes
• [ ] No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Refactored request handling in appveyor.php, codacy.php, and github.php to pass headers before data.
• Enhanced error handling for Codacy requests.
• Updated the AI commit message generation script in .githooks/prepare-commit-msg.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

appveyor.php Refactor AppVeyor request handling                                              Src/lib/appveyor.php Updated the request method to pass headers before data. Improved the structure of the request handling. +2/-2      codacy.php Refactor Codacy request handling                                                  Src/lib/codacy.php Modified the post request to include headers correctly. Enhanced error handling for Codacy requests. +1/-1      github.php Refactor GitHub request handling                                                  Src/lib/github.php Adjusted the request methods to pass headers before data. Improved the handling of different HTTP methods. +3/-3      prepare-commit-msg Update commit message generation script                                    .githooks/prepare-commit-msg Updated the AI commit message generation command. Improved error handling for commit message generation. +1/-1

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced AI-powered commit message generation with updated parameters for improved functionality.

• Bug Fixes

  • Adjusted parameter order in API request methods to ensure proper data handling for requests to AppVeyor, Codacy, and GitHub.

• Refactor

  • Streamlined internal logic for handling requests in various API integrations without altering overall functionality.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to several PHP scripts and a Git hook. The .githooks/prepare-commit-msg script has been updated to enhance commit message generation by incorporating a branch name parameter. In the Src/lib/appveyor.php, Src/lib/codacy.php, and Src/lib/github.php files, the order of parameters for HTTP request methods has been altered, affecting how requests are constructed without changing the overall logic of the functions.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.githooks/prepare-commit-msg	Updated command to invoke dotnet-aicommitmessage with new parameters including a branch name.
Src/lib/appveyor.php	Changed parameter order for put and post methods in requestAppVeyor function.
Src/lib/codacy.php	Modified bypassPullRequestAnalysis to remove a null parameter from the post method.
Src/lib/github.php	Altered parameter order for POST, PUT, and PATCH methods in doRequestGitHub function.

Possibly related PRs

• #576: This PR introduces a new function bypassPullRequestAnalysis in Src/lib/codacy.php, which is directly related to the changes in the main PR that enhance the functionality of the .githooks/prepare-commit-msg script for generating commit messages, as both involve interactions with Codacy's API and commit message handling.

Suggested labels

size/L, Review effort [1-5]: 4, documentation

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

🐇 In the code we hop and play,
New hooks and functions come our way.
With messages crafted, neat and bright,
Our commits now shine with delight!
So let’s code on, with joy and cheer,
For every change brings us near! 🐰✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

[deepsource-io[bot]]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 2394ba1..a5e33a9. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	3, because the changes involve refactoring request handling across multiple files, which requires understanding the existing logic and ensuring that the new implementation maintains the intended functionality.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	Potential Bug: The order of parameters in the request methods has changed. Ensure that the API being called accepts the new parameter order.
🔒 Security concerns	No

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[penify-dev[bot]]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Add a check for the availability of the dotnet-aicommitmessage command before execution ___ **Consider adding a check to ensure that the dotnet-aicommitmessage command is available before executing it to avoid command not found errors.** [.githooks/prepare-commit-msg [22]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/585/files#diff-dcfff605ffad618dd937de6369eb0e61d25656d8e2a0ba5ed3546b025c39678dR22-R22) ```diff -if ! AI_MESSAGE=$(dotnet-aicommitmessage generate-message -m "$CURRENT" -b "branch-name" -d "$GIT_DIFF" ); then +if ! command -v dotnet-aicommitmessage &> /dev/null || ! AI_MESSAGE=$(dotnet-aicommitmessage generate-message -m "$CURRENT" -b "branch-name" -d "$GIT_DIFF" ); then ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion is important as it addresses a potential runtime error that could occur if the command is not available, making it a valuable improvement for robustness.	8
Possible issue	Validate $data before using it in request methods to prevent issues ___ **Confirm that the $data variable is properly formatted and not null before passing it to the post, put, patch, and delete methods to avoid unexpected behavior.** [Src/lib/github.php [55]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/585/files#diff-69595ea07bc28a4778b3a81502d54299c0a3d3314cd3fc58b7c8793fd56dc5c4R55-R55) ```diff -$response = $request->post($url, $headers, $data); +if ($data !== null) { + $response = $request->post($url, $headers, $data); +} ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: This suggestion addresses a potential issue with `$data` being null, which is more critical than the previous suggestions, but it could be improved by providing a specific check implementation.	7
	Verify that $headers is defined before usage in request methods ___ **Ensure that the $headers variable is defined and passed correctly to the post and put methods to avoid potential errors.** [Src/lib/appveyor.php [24-25]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/585/files#diff-5fce1078e9d444b9e1fba4d604da8c5cce4bea99ec46630f01297d8997ceb301R24-R25) ```diff +$response = $isPut +? $request->put($url, $headers, json_encode($data)) +: $request->post($url, $headers, json_encode($data)); - ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: While it's good practice to ensure that `$headers` is defined, the suggestion does not provide a specific context or check for its initialization, making it less critical.	6
	Ensure $headers is initialized before making the request ___ **Check if the $headers variable is properly initialized before using it in the post method to prevent runtime errors.** [Src/lib/codacy.php [40]](https://github.com/guibranco/gstraccini-bot/pull/585/files#diff-8e8a57642b5a12afa405f783949c4ef64de21496160696e6b42469e7c099d632R40-R40) ```diff +$response = $request->post($baseUrl . $url, $headers); - ``` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Similar to the first suggestion, it emphasizes the importance of checking `$headers`, but lacks a specific context or implementation detail, which reduces its urgency.	6

[github-actions[bot]]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

```txt 9:42AM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 9:42AM INF 507 commits scanned. 9:42AM INF scan completed in 133ms 9:42AM INF no leaks found ```