guibranco / gstraccini-bot-service

πŸ€– :octocat: GStraccini-bot automates repository management, ensuring organization and health by handling pull requests, issues, comments, and commits.
https://gstraccini.bot
MIT License
2 stars 0 forks source link

fix - Corrected Codacy commit reanalysis URL and headers. #699

Closed guibranco closed 2 days ago

guibranco commented 2 days ago

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

β„Ή Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 days ago

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the URL construction for Codacy analysis in the Src/comments.php file and updates to the headers and POST request construction in the Src/lib/codacy.php file. Specifically, the Codacy analysis link now uses the headSha property from the $metadata array. Additionally, the bypassPullRequestAnalysis and reanalyzeCommit functions have been updated to include a JSON content type header and to properly format the POST request parameters.

Changes

File Change Summary
Src/comments.php Updated URL construction in execute_codacyReanalyzeCommit to use headSha from $metadata.
Src/lib/codacy.php - Added "Content-Type: application/json" header in bypassPullRequestAnalysis and reanalyzeCommit.
- Modified URL concatenation in bypassPullRequestAnalysis.
- Changed POST request parameters to a JSON-encoded string in reanalyzeCommit.
- Function signatures for bypassPullRequestAnalysis and reanalyzeCommit updated.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

size/M

Suggested reviewers

🐰 In the code where comments dwell,
A link was fixed, oh what a spell!
With headers bright and JSON neat,
Codacy's calls are now complete.
Hopping through functions, we cheer,
For clearer paths, the end is near! πŸŽ‰

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 35 seconds before requesting another review.

βŒ› How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
🚦 How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq) for further information.
πŸ“₯ Commits Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bfed626413c1cf7ca645bd341dd2197800ca8cf4 and 305e6f9c6eeea42385f972d878e9cea220295ab3.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
πŸͺ§ Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
deepsource-io[bot] commented 2 days ago

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits bfed626..305e6f9. View details on DeepSource β†—.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Docker LogoDockerβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource PHP LogoPHPβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecretsβœ… SuccessView Check β†—
DeepSource SQL LogoSQLβœ… SuccessView Check β†—

πŸ’‘ If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.
sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 days ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

github-actions[bot] commented 2 days ago

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

πŸ’» Scan logs ```txt 12:05AM INF scanning for exposed secrets... 12:05AM INF 643 commits scanned. 12:05AM INF scan completed in 147ms 12:05AM INF no leaks found ```