guibranco / projects-monitor

โš™๏ธ๐Ÿ”” GitHub projects monitor
https://guilherme.straccini.com/projects-monitor/
MIT License
3 stars 0 forks source link

Correct spelling in index.php section title #543

Closed guibranco closed 2 months ago

guibranco commented 2 months ago

Description


Changes walkthrough ๐Ÿ“

Relevant files
Enhancement
index.php
Fix spelling in index.php section title                                   

Src/index.php
  • Corrected spelling in the section title.
  • Changed "Pull Requets Blocked" to "Pull Requests Blocked".
  • +1/-1     

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 months ago

    [!CAUTION]

    Review failed

    The pull request is closed.

    Walkthrough

    The pull request introduces a minor textual correction in the Src/index.php file, specifically changing the label from "Pull Requets Blocked" to "Pull Requests Blocked." This adjustment ensures the terminology is accurate and consistent within the user interface. The change does not affect the application's functionality or logic.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    Src/index.php Renamed "Pull Requets Blocked" to "Pull Requests Blocked"

    Possibly related PRs

    ๐Ÿ‡ In the code where words do play,
    A typo found its way to stay.
    "Pull Requets" now is no more,
    "Pull Requests" opens the door!
    Clarity hops in, bright and clear,
    A little fix brings us good cheer! ๐Ÿฐโœจ


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: -- `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` -- `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` -- `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: -- `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` -- `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` -- `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` -- `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

    PR Review ๐Ÿ”

    โฑ๏ธ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 1, because the change is a simple spelling correction that requires minimal review effort.
    ๐Ÿงช Relevant tests No
    โšก Possible issues No
    ๐Ÿ”’ Security concerns No
    penify-dev[bot] commented 2 months ago

    PR Code Suggestions โœจ

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Suggest adding a unique ID to the new section for better accessibility and reference ___ **Consider adding a unique ID to the new section for easier reference in scripts or styles.** [Src/index.php [93]](https://github.com/guibranco/projects-monitor/pull/543/files#diff-c36e974b0230f93b7db2439aded00cfaa35acbf92cf0e85684123eb169812425R93-R93) ```diff -
    Pull Requests Blocked
    +
    Pull Requests Blocked
    ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding a unique ID can improve maintainability and accessibility, making this a worthwhile suggestion, though it is not critical.
    7
    Enhancement
    Recommend adding localization support for the new section title ___ **Ensure that the new section title is properly localized if the application supports
    multiple languages.** [Src/index.php [93]](https://github.com/guibranco/projects-monitor/pull/543/files#diff-c36e974b0230f93b7db2439aded00cfaa35acbf92cf0e85684123eb169812425R93-R93) ```diff -
    Pull Requests Blocked
    +
    ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Adding localization support is a good practice for applications with multilingual capabilities, but it is not essential for the current change.
    6
    Maintainability
    Suggest rephrasing the section title for consistency with existing terminology ___ **Consider ensuring that the new section title is consistent with the existing terminology
    used throughout the application to maintain clarity and coherence.** [Src/index.php [93]](https://github.com/guibranco/projects-monitor/pull/543/files#diff-c36e974b0230f93b7db2439aded00cfaa35acbf92cf0e85684123eb169812425R93-R93) ```diff -
    Pull Requests Blocked
    +
    Blocked Pull Requests
    ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While consistency in terminology is important, the suggested change does not address a critical issue and is more of a stylistic preference.
    5
    Possible issue
    Check for potential conflicts with existing styles or scripts due to the new section title ___ **Verify that the new section title does not conflict with any existing CSS styles or
    JavaScript functionality that may rely on specific class names or IDs.** [Src/index.php [93]](https://github.com/guibranco/projects-monitor/pull/543/files#diff-c36e974b0230f93b7db2439aded00cfaa35acbf92cf0e85684123eb169812425R93-R93) ```diff +
    Pull Requests Blocked
    - ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: While checking for conflicts is a valid concern, the suggestion does not provide actionable steps and lacks specificity regarding potential issues.
    4
    github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    9:36AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    9:36AM INF 492 commits scanned.
    9:36AM INF scan completed in 257ms
    9:36AM INF no leaks found
    
    sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

    Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

    Issues
    0 New issues
    0 Accepted issues

    Measures
    0 Security Hotspots
    0.0% Coverage on New Code
    0.0% Duplication on New Code

    See analysis details on SonarCloud

    github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

    :rocket: Postman tests are disabled

    :x: The Postman collection run is disabled.

    github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

    :test_tube: Request tests summary

    :white_check_mark: All test requests succeeded

    github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

    :mag: Database integrity summary

    :white_check_mark: The database integrity check succeeded

    github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

    :fire_engine: Smoke tests summary

    :fire: Smoke tests passed!