Closed zedissime closed 1 year ago
Doesn't https://github.com/guigrpa/docx-templates#html do what you want?
Doesn't https://github.com/guigrpa/docx-templates#html do what you want?
Thank you for your prompt answer ! In fact in my template I'm not able to say if the result of my custom function will be a string containing HTML or not.
For example, in my usecase :
The method t(translation_key)
will look in an object like this:
{
disclaimer: {
en: '<ul><li>Rule 01</li><li>Rule 02</li></ul>',
fr: '<ul><li>Règle 01</li><li>Règle 02</li></ul>'
},
hello: {
en: 'Hello',
fr: 'Bonjour !'
}
}
I'm not confortable to force my users to add the HTML
tag when they are writing their templates, as I should be able to transform the result of this custom method.
Ah ok, thanks for clarifying your use case. I'm afraid that's a hard limitation of the library: you need to know whether the result of your command will be HTML or not, or else docx-templates won't know how to embed it in the document's XML tree...
Hmm sad news.
Maybe a work around would be to wrap all my results of the t()
function by a <span>
like this I would always have an HTML as result ?
Yes that sounds like it could work. You would still need to use {HTML t(xyz)}
commands everywhere, though.
It seems like you question is answered, so I'll close the issue. You can still reply to it though, but be sure to tag me using @jjhbw .
I was wondering if there was a way to insert HTML in the document.
In my document generator, I've added a method in the additionalJsContext in order to have a custom method accessible. This custom method receive a translation key, search for this translation key in a translation object and return the result. It works well for most of our cases, but we have some translations that are plain HTML (for a basic formatting purpose : list, bold, etc).
Is there a way to wrap the result of my function in order to be interpreted from HTML to altchunk (?) in the template ?