Open MichaelTiemannOSC opened 2 years ago
Hi @MichaelTiemannOSC ! Yes, this is definitely a good use case for ODH-Highlander. Even more, it's one I use when presenting the project: on large scale environment, with many users, each of them need/want their own particular library, with more than often this one, or a dependancy, being something that cannot be installed with pip inside a notebook. We talked in May with Marcel about installing Highlander on OperateFirst as a PoC. Now that we have a good use case to validate the real-world viability, I guess it's time for action! Let me ping him and see what we can do.
Great news. Please note that we have onboarded some LinuxFoundation staff to manage and support OperateFirst for OS-Climate. They are copied on the initial issue. Because they are still ramping up, they will definitely need guidance if this touches a lot of unfamiliar OperateFirst territory, but if it's just a question of adding a line to https://github.com/operate-first/apps/blob/master/kfdefs/overlays/osc/osc-cl2/kustomization.yaml then we don't necessarily need to wait for Marcel.
Lol! If only it was a line to add... No, there is tons of work to do, I need shared storage setup in a very specific way, we need to build specific libraries and images depending on what you want to do... It's a least a couple of months of work (elapse) before being able to test anything for real.
Just checking in...this still looks like best approach among many I've seen.
If you want to follow-up onboarding: https://github.com/operate-first/support/issues/617
After discussing https://github.com/os-climate/physrisk/issues/86 we were pointed to this project as providing a more elegant solution than building infinitely many slightly differently customized notebooks. Is the Highlander approach ready and able to address the problems identified in the above issue?