This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of bem-xjst.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Hello lovely humans,
bem-xjst just published its new version 7.3.1.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of bem-xjst. Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right? Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project :sparkles:
You rock!
:palm_tree:
GitHub Release
2016-09-22 v7.3.1, @miripiruni
New runtime lint cases:
New benchmark test with histogram graph any revision compare and no dependencies.
Commits:
b26bdf6045
] - Docs: modes in BEMTREE (fix for #335) (miripiruni)4f41cb41b7
] - Runtime lint: check block, elem, modifier names and modifier values (miripiruni)6daa6fe7ea
] - Runtime lint: check mix the same elemMods (miripiruni)9a128aa330
] - Runtime lint: check mix the same mods (miripiruni)7c6ce3abe2
] - Docs: example improved (miripiruni)bf385ec6d0
] - Bench: port of new benchmark test from v6.x (miripiruni)The new version differs by 83 commits (ahead by 83, behind by 8).
2f9123a
7.3.1
35878bc
update AUTHORS
f44afcc
changelog updated
bd0dd65
Merge pull request #352 from bem/issue-350__check-mix
b26bdf6
Docs: modes in BEMTREE (fix for #335)
4f41cb4
Runtime lint: check block, elem, modifier names and modifier values
6daa6fe
Runtime lint: check mix the same elemMods
9a128aa
Runtime lint: check mix the same mods
7c6ce3a
Docs: example improved
bf385ec
Bench: port of new benchmark test from v6.x
675e7e9
7.3.0
dbbd4aa
update AUTHORS
f9d6cd4
changelog updated
6ade6c1
Docs: second argument of mod() or elemMod() is optional
61e555b
Merge pull request #346 from bem/issue-274__mods-wildcard
There are 83 commits in total. See the full diff.
This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
Tired of seeing this sponsor message? :zap:
greenkeeper upgrade