Closed sttk closed 5 years ago
@sttk I'm thinking about this a bit more recently - are we planning to release a 2.6 of Liftoff or do we want to do a major (3.0) bump? If we are going to do a major bump, we could probably clean up this API in some ways.
@phated I agree with a major bump.
I think we should reconsider about relations of cwd
, configPath
and modulePath
, too. I found that requiring paths can be controlled with module.paths
, so it's ok that the directories of these three paths are different.
Since this will change current behavior, I think a major bump is better.
This has been rebased and merged.
Closed by 35a3519cf4363e02a44bab2af5ab2b3a28492231
Amazing work, as always, @sttk
@sttk btw, I marked this as a "fix" in the commit history - maybe that is incorrect and we should actually make it an "update" and then cut this as 2.6.0
I don't think this should be a major because it's just changing the logging in the CLI.
I've rebased and force-pushed the "update" label on that commit. I'll tag it as 2.6.0 and publish it tonight.
Ugh. I'm actually a liar and I decided to release it as a major release. Going to force push 1 more time and cut the 3.0 release.
@sttk 3.0.0 published!
@phated Thank you a lot for reviewing, merging and bumping major version!
Because I think just
'require'
event is enough when one of loaders succeeded.