Add mootools More to AJAX Libraries API

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. call google.load("mootools-more", "1.2.1");

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Mootools More should be loaded but an error ("Module: 'mootools-more' not 
found!") occurs.

Please provide any additional information below.
Please add mootools More to the AJAX Libraries API.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by www.bansa@googlemail.com on 6 Nov 2008 at 8:21

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I would love to see the more API available as well.  It kind of goes hand and 
hand
with Mootools if you are looking to do any GUI work.

Original comment by sdmur...@pictage.com on 12 Nov 2008 at 12:07

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Actually, if you can make a core +more release that is one file that would be 
great.
 The extra request is a little annoying and defeats the benefit of using a CDN.

Original comment by sdmur...@pictage.com on 19 Nov 2008 at 10:05

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by jrgeer...@gmail.com on 29 Nov 2008 at 11:15

• Added labels: APIType-Libs, Type-Suggestion

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Please add the "more" thing!
Should have been there from the beginning...

Original comment by quenti...@gmail.com on 20 Feb 2009 at 2:39

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

yes please add. 
I've only just started to try to use google api to load mootools.
Is there a obvious reason why mootools more is not included?

Original comment by step...@surferuk.co.uk on 3 Jun 2009 at 3:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Mootools with out More is mainly pointless for me.  Please add More.

Original comment by ney...@gmail.com on 17 Jul 2009 at 7:32

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I don't understand why it hasn't been implemented yet. Now i have to change 
back my
code to use the library from my ftp 'cause i'm unable to use mootools fx.scroll 
with
google jsapi. Too bad.. :(

Original comment by lois.p...@gmail.com on 24 Sep 2009 at 8:59

[GoogleCodeExporter]

HURRY UP AND ADD IT GOOGLE!!

You added jQuery UI, so why not MooTools More?

Original comment by www.adam...@gmail.com on 13 Oct 2009 at 6:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi all,

Please star this issue to vote for it instead of adding a "me too" comment :-) 
We
look at stars to gauge relative popularity and they are less noisy for other 
people
who have starred.

Cheers,

Jeff 

Original comment by jscud.w...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2009 at 9:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Surely by now you all behind this project know it should be part of it. ;-) 
It's pretty 
incredible that this major half of the utility has not yet been included.

Yes, I starred it. I've had it starred for months now. :-P

Original comment by mpsincl...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2009 at 9:22

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I starred as well.  Just fix it.  It can't be all that dificult.

Original comment by sabsh...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2009 at 10:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Excuse me but it's very important (I think) to give "more" possibility. I need 
"Drag"
method and Localization

Original comment by Metal3d on 2 Dec 2009 at 2:00

[GoogleCodeExporter]

So how many stars do we need, Jeff?

Any insight as to what the hold up is?

Original comment by mpsincl...@gmail.com on 4 Dec 2009 at 6:07

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Is there anything in the works for this at all?

Original comment by somnium...@gmail.com on 15 Dec 2009 at 9:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It still baffles me as to why it isn't included?

Original comment by XMil...@gmail.com on 19 Jan 2010 at 3:25

[GoogleCodeExporter]

star from me too... cant wait to see it there.... its like brain without body!

Original comment by karlsche...@gmail.com on 31 Jan 2010 at 6:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

@Google: Is there anything that has to be done to make this happen?

Original comment by enrique....@gmail.com on 1 Feb 2010 at 8:06

[GoogleCodeExporter]

If JQuery and JQuery UI are both are available via the Google AJAX libraries 
API, Why
is Mootools More left out? Does this mean that Google is favoring JQuery over 
Mootools?

Original comment by spit...@gmail.com on 16 Feb 2010 at 7:00

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Unfortunately probably means just that

Original comment by smile...@gmail.com on 16 Feb 2010 at 7:12

[GoogleCodeExporter]

JQuery has not code standards... please give us Mootools in google API :)

Original comment by Metal3d on 17 Feb 2010 at 12:41

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Probably I also have to add comment here, since nothing happens for a long time 
and
this ignorance from Goolge starts to look for me as if it's on (illegal) 
purpose... 

Original comment by tsveto...@gmail.com on 17 Feb 2010 at 12:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Everybody should "star" this issue. Please remember to do this because Google 
use 
stars to count votes

Original comment by Metal3d on 17 Feb 2010 at 4:17

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Shouldn't even be a matter of needing to count votes on this issue.

What's the hold up? How many stars do we need before this issue warrants 
attention?

Original comment by mpsincl...@gmail.com on 17 Feb 2010 at 4:36

[GoogleCodeExporter]

C'mon Google, don't be evil!
mootools-more is really worth it to get your support!

Original comment by iw.der.s...@googlemail.com on 17 Feb 2010 at 4:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Another user diappointed that mootools-more is not added to the jsapi...

Original comment by tamal...@gmail.com on 19 Feb 2010 at 4:53

[GoogleCodeExporter]

This has really been an issue for this long?!??! Add the library already!

Original comment by Kab...@gmail.com on 21 Feb 2010 at 6:13

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Hi all,

My name is Aaron. I'm a MooTools developer. I'm the principal developer of 
MooTools More.

First, I love all these comments. They're awesome and they make us feel like 
our work is loved, so thank you.

As to the issue, I actually don't think -more belongs on Google. MooTools More 
isn't meant to be used 
wholesale. I've never, ever, ever used a project that used all of it. It 
includes dozens of localization files, 
plugins for Accordion, Sortables, Form Validation, JSONP, and 70 other things. 
It's just not designed to be a 
library you include entirely. You're asking your users to download several 
hundred K of JavaScript so you can 
use some portion of it. Including all of -more here makes as much sense (to me) 
as including all of jQuery's 
community plugins or all the plugins in the MooTools Forge.

MooTools More is a collection of plugins that we, MooTools team members, author 
and maintain. But it's just 
that; a collection of plugins. It's not a library like MooTools Core, where if 
you're going to use any of it you're 
probably going to use all of it (well, maybe not Swiff).

If you really disagree with me, by all means, continue your petition here (hey 
Google, if these people still want 
it, you have my blessing; go for it). But I think you'd be better off rolling 
your own custom version that 
includes only what your site needs.

Original comment by anut...@gmail.com on 23 Feb 2010 at 5:33

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I agree with what you are saying, Aaron, but I think the problem is that there 
isn't much of a point to using the 
google api to load -core if you can't access ANY of -more.

Original comment by Kab...@gmail.com on 23 Feb 2010 at 6:29