Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
You don't want to use the built-in bootstrap. It will make your site look just
like every other site that's using it.
If you still want a CDN, just use http://www.bootstrapcdn.com/.
I'm tired of getting "me too" emails (along with 320 other people). I am
removing myself from this, as I no longer care.
Original comment by kellystu...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2013 at 7:34
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
"SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be
interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
1. DO NOT Comment unless you have something useful to say.
kellystu...@gmail.com is right, too many "me too" comments. Remember everyone
(313 people) who has starred this gets a notification.
2. kellystu...@gmail.com, most sites SHOULD have a custom css stylesheet
anyway, to make their site look different. We are also aware of
bootstrapcdn.com. We are all probably using it already. We simply want it added
to Google's CDN. I would also like to say that cdnjs is another option. It is
supposedly faster than Google's CDN.
3. If anyone else does a "me too" message, I WILL personally get your email and
write a bot to spam it.
4. Sorry to add to your inbox people. I WON'T do it again if I can help it.
-- Mr. Grumpy Face
Original comment by bardi.ha...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2013 at 9:37
http://www.bootstrapcdn.com really isn't very reliable. This isn't just another
"me too" comment. Their CDN simply isn't as good as Google. If your site is
built on Bootstrap, and the CDN is down or running slowly, your site simply
breaks or takes forever to finish loading.
What's the purpose of a CDN if it isn't reliable? What "MUST" we do to get
bootstrap or FontAwesome onto Google's CDN? ("MUST" being used in accordance
with RFC 2119)
Original comment by sshowal...@symmetrycommunications.net
on 20 Mar 2014 at 10:45
I agree
Original comment by CraneLe...@gmail.com
on 21 Apr 2014 at 6:39
MS added it too
http://www.asp.net/ajaxlibrary/cdn.ashx#Bootstrap_Releases_on_the_CDN_14
Original comment by avmurad...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2014 at 3:23
I don't think Google is going to host it, because it is affiliated with Twitter.
Original comment by shak...@gmail.com
on 1 May 2014 at 3:25
I do agree
Original comment by faridul...@gmail.com
on 12 Sep 2014 at 4:04
Agree.
Original comment by ad...@siteratios.com
on 16 Sep 2014 at 10:37
I don't presume to know the best interest in this for Google as a business, but
I'll add my two cents. The current cdns that are available for bootstrap are
utter garbage, and terribly slow and unreliable. Google would certainly remedy
this, so to the powers that be, make a call.
Original comment by randya.c...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2014 at 4:14
+1 - I'd prefer to link to Google's CDN for both jQuery and Bootstrap
Original comment by Thorne.M...@gmail.com
on 12 Jul 2015 at 6:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dina.pa...@gmail.com
on 26 Aug 2012 at 10:40