Closed Hypercube1234 closed 5 months ago
What I see in the manual's PDF is:
which looks correct to me. Could you elaborate what do you mean by "problems"?
Copying the default-values from the documentation into the preamble leads to an incorrect display of the footnote-marker. Removing the @ corrects the display, however.
\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{postnotes}
\postnotesetup{
makemark = {#2\hbox{\@textsuperscript{\normalfont#1}}#3} ,
maketextmark = {#2#1.#3}}
\begin{document}
Test\postnote{Test}
\printpostnotes
\end{document}
Ah, I see. But that is a problem in your document, not in the manual. If you want to use a macro containing a @
you'd need to wrap it between \makeatletter
and \makeatother
, like so:
\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{postnotes}
\makeatletter
\postnotesetup{
makemark = {#2\hbox{\@textsuperscript{\normalfont#1}}#3} ,
maketextmark = {#2#1.#3}}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
Test\postnote{Test}
\printpostnotes
\end{document}
The manual is making a statement on the default value of the option, which is indeed {#2\hbox{\@textsuperscript{\normalfont#1}}#3}
, but the handling of catcodes for macros containing @
is already done in the package (inside the .sty
). This value is so because it is the same definition used in the kernel for footnotes, which uses the internal \@textsuperscript
.
But in your document you can very well just go with \textsuperscript
and not bother with that. That's OK.
Anyway, thanks for the concern and the report.
In the documentation, the line containing \@textsuperscript leads to problems when reproducing (the »@«)
https://github.com/gusbrs/postnotes/blob/10ba78acb5e3dfff3729577ec97cb7696bfab34c/postnotes-doc.tex#L382
Looks like it was predefined from »listings«. I noticed this when I played around with the font-formatting of the label.