Closed canadaduane closed 2 years ago
Good point - we could just go for chomp, my concern was just it can be tricky to type sometimes...
Yeah, I thought that may be the case. I agree the "m" in there is not optimal. "chop" is easy to type, but perhaps even more misleading from a pedagogical standpoint? :/
Yeah I think you're right, chomp isn't that bad to type I suppose. Will push that up in the next commit.
I like brevity, but I also appreciate being able to learn what's happening when seeing others' code or commands for the first time. I think using the full name "chomp" will lead to better outcomes wrt sharing and teaching.
FWIW I see "chp" and want to pronounce it "chip".
edit to add: I considered aliasing
chomp
tochp
so I could see the full name and find familiarity with the project & name, but then thought that was silly and made this suggestion instead :)