I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing the behavior of parallel when there is an error in the clusters. Currently a message is displayed and a value is returned in r(). Most commands, however, exit with an error when not being able to run. Why is it that parallel doesn't display a message and then throw an error?
Sounds like a better option. I don't recall why I did it that way, but it actually doesn't make sense to not throw an error if there is one in any of the clusters. Let's do it that way.
I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing the behavior of
parallel
when there is an error in the clusters. Currently a message is displayed and a value is returned inr()
. Most commands, however, exit with an error when not being able to run. Why is it thatparallel
doesn't display a message and then throw an error?