Closed ykowsar closed 7 years ago
That issue description made no sense hahaha 😂 is this the issue where if its not like segments_dir/<actual_segments>
and instead it has for eg segments_dir/dir2/dir3/<actual_segments>
, swift itself is OK but GenomeSpace won't hide the segments?
Yes. Exactly :D
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Madison Flannery <notifications@github.com
wrote:
That issue description made no sense hahaha 😂 is this the issue where if its not like segments_dir/
and instead it has for eg segments_dir/dir2/dir3/ , swift itself is OK but GenomeSpace won't hide the segments? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gvlproject/genomespace/issues/67#issuecomment-262663229, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIF_oB2eydw-lZpyitn00cnPe1c3Wt-yks5rBNvhgaJpZM4K6UjZ .
Can we somehow use the info under the section Retrieving a large object
from http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_large_objects.html
specifically the part where you can grab the manifest itself?
Theoretically that works but speed-wise I don't imagine it's great?
Is the verdict that we're closing this? and documenting it?
People can select any path as the path for segments and if the path is the same name with the file but with multiple level of hierarchy from swift point of view everything is fine but ...