Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
This feature may be appreciated by the advanced users. But the layman
programmer may
be intimidated by terms such as "Unsafe". And then we will have the additional
overhead of explaining people Unsafe is a word explained in an RFC, so that they
don't assume something else. My opinion, keep it simple!
Original comment by subwiz
on 19 Feb 2008 at 5:22
Original comment by subwiz
on 19 Feb 2008 at 8:26
I still think there'd be value in making two groups:
Group 1: "Non-Changing Methods": GET, HEAD, TRACE, OPTIONS
Group 2: "Changing Methods": POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH
Oh, and that reminds me: we should consider adding support for PATCH. I'll add
a separate issue for that.
Original comment by aviflax
on 19 Feb 2008 at 4:52
Original comment by subwiz
on 21 Feb 2009 at 5:26
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
aviflax
on 18 Feb 2008 at 8:06